Expand Quote
Expand Quote
In terms of durability, I think in general Bones wheels last longer but at the cost of feeling shittier. And a softer wheel will typically wear down quicker. Is what it is. Choose your priorities.
And yes the reformulated F4 97a is still on the way and I think pretty soon.
BONES STF last forever, spits not as long (speaking to standard wheels, not these soft forumulations) and yeah, there are trade offs. And while a wider wheel *may* get you ever so sightly longer wheel life, it's still gonna where down because it's softer.
in my experience a wider wheel in the same formula lasts significantly longer, as well as being more functional once they are worn down to smaller diameters. i would be fine with the fact that 93a f4 wear down faster if i had the option to buy a thicker shape that has more urethane on it to begin with.
I was going to ask but then thought this most likely would have been the response, so I am glad to see that answer anyway.
Not a worry, but I try not to go from curious questions about wheel use to only thinking of my own experiences as answers, so this is good to know, as I was going to say something similar, asking did one or two mm difference in wheel shape really make that much difference if the formula itself is the thing that matters, so any wheel shape is going to end up wearing down about the same in that regard, be it Conical Full, Radial Full, etc.
Those shapes are totally different to Classics though, so as much as a Classic 60 mm 93 duro wheel might be on the way, some people would still just say NO, even though I think that shape would actually be really good for that formula, which is why they are bringing it out.