Expand Quote
Expand Quote
The internet famous Young Turks picked up the story.� The fire's getting hot.
God damnit...she's 12, she's 14, she's 12, she's 14.....
She's 12. The idiots saying she's 14 saw that the count says "a child under the age of fourteen years" and are too dumb to realize that means she is younger than 14, not that she's actually 14. It also says Barajas at age 23 is over 10 years older than her. She's 12.
if you would have read the entire document, you would have seen that the 15 charges do have contradictions.
for example, in charge 1:
On or about November 4, 2015, in the County of Los Angeles, the crime of LEWD ACT UPON A CHILD, in violation of PENAL CODE SECTION 288(c)(1), a Felony, was committed by JOSE LUIS BARAJAS, who did willfully, unlawfully and lewdly commit a lewd and lascivious act upon and with the body of T A., who was 14 years old, with the intent of arousing, appealing to, and gratifying the lust, passions, and sexual desires of the defendant, who was at least 10 years older than T A..that states her age as 14, not as a child under 14.
she may very well be 12, or possibly 13, or even 14, but i'm not going to jump to absolutist conclusions before all the facts have been made available. that's your department, idiot.