Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
These boards are an endless fountain of white knights.
Clarify that. Because really, you seem to be implying that you are a total pile of shit scumbag.
3wK
I'm not sure what that's supposed to mean, but I'm assuming "wk" stands for white knight, and that white knight is an epithet for guys who act like BEATING THE SHIT OUT OF WOMEN are trying to play hero or look good for women, instead of just genuinely registering their disgust. That's pretty fucking stupid since I'm not single, nor do I think any women at all post or view my posts on this virtually 100% male message board community. Here's whats fucked up about you jumping to the "white knight" conclusion- those of you making that claim don't even understand why a person would be genuinely disgusted by a professional athlete beating the fuck out of a woman he supposedly loved. Your first thought is "nobody would actually mind that, he's just pretending to mind it to look good," instead of "wow, that girl went through something horrible, and the perpetrator is part of our community," and a feeling of disgust. You are worse than shit if that's your take on it, and you try to gaslight the situation by pretending those who find his actions unacceptable are just playing some sort of social justice warrior role on something that shouldn't be an issue. Nah man, fuck you.
I think it's a combination of the rush to judgement with no definitive proof, and sticking your nose in someone else's business to boost your sense of self worth instead of actually trying to help the situation you're upping yourself off of. Between you being shy when it comes to saying nigga and feeling good about yourself even though you didn't do anything to help the alleged victim, there's probably a Louis CK stand up routine that's applicable to every facet of your being.
What rush to judgement? The photos and her testimony she got beaten up are clear evidence. Are we as a community just supposed to accept that? We talk shit about everything else, but beating women is out of bounds? And who is boosting who's self-worth? Registering disgust isn't really boosting anybody's self-worth, its saying that its fucked up, just like a lot of other shit we hate on here. But somehow, when the topic of beating women comes up your response is "sticking your nose in someone else's business to boost your sense of self worth instead of actually trying to help the situation you're upping yourself off of." Again, nobody gains anything by saying a woman beater is a piece of shit.
And the fact that I don't use racial slurs means what exactly? I'm pretty sure it just means that I'm not an asshole, like you, the kind of person who thinks its wrong to NOT use racial slurs. I've never made any statement about not using racial slurs, you just correctly assumed I don't, and are ANGRY about that fact. Seriously, what kind of fucked up morality are you trying to convince people of? You are judging more than anybody else here. You are moral signalling more than anybody else here. Your morals are "people who don't like beating women are just trying to make themselves look good, and you are a pussy if you don't use racial slurs." What exactly are you getting out of trying to argue that point?
And if you think that a guy who regularly acknowledges and mocks white privilege is making fun of people for not being a racist asshole, I don't think you actually understand Louis CK's humor...like at all.
You omitted the word nigga from a direct TK quote, "Be mad at the
guy negotiating your deals"- You. It's someone else's words, don't let your white guilt prevent you from accurately quoting source material.
Be real here. Most people flocked here to ego stroke, because social media is about creating an online persona that you want to project. I don't see anyone actually doing shit about the situation, I just see a bunch of finger pointing. Calling a spade a spade is empty talk unless you play your hand, so do something to back up your word or leave it for someone else who actually cares to address it.
Also, I can tell you're a grade school teacher and not a lawyer. Show me definitively connected proof that links Daryl Angel to this and I'll be the first person to bite my tongue, but you're shit out of luck if you're taking two pics that were taken years apart with no mention of Daryl out of the victims mouth. I'm talking about something that would actually hold up in court, not something that would be thrown out because Gip Esq was trying to use a game of connect the dots in his discovery package.
You're probably the type to think the Webster definition of assault is the same as the legal definition.