Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Italian horror film's have been my go to as of late.
Salo
El Topa
Holy Mountain
Maniac
Day of the Beast
Suspiria
Faust Italian movie not the Hollywood shit film.
I like fucked up movie's but I draw the line ___________ when it comes to torture horror film's, shit is garbage.
Torture Porn eg..... Serbian Film, Hostel, Saw, Descent
Torture porn?
You mean a movie where a group of fascist libertines round up young boys and girls and subject them to physical, mental, and sexual torture over the entire course of the movie? You mean a movie called Salo or the 120 Days of Sodom? Kinda like that?
Not sure if you are being intentionally thick or not. I really can't tell.
Okay we're on the same page of understanding and no I don't enjoy the rape murder and torture it plays out, however comparing this movie to a modern horror movie the violence is so fake compared to modern movies, I'd gladly pick this movie more that an Saw or Hostel or any other recent movie.
Yeah as vile and depraved as Salo is... I wouldn't really consider it 'torture porn', compared to movies like Flowers of Flesh and Blood, August Underground or Serbian Film. Salo does have some artistic merit (even Martin Scorcese is a fan!), although it's a movie I never ever, ever want to see again. What's even crazier is the movie is TAMER than the book it's based on.
I actually watched that movie on a fucking date with this goth/industrial/'boyd rice fan' type-of-girl, it really fucked me up for a few days.
I'm not debating if Salo has artistic merit or not, it clearly does and is a very important film within Italian cinema. But I absolutely would call it a preface to those contemporary movies you listed.
Just as a Serbian Film or Hostel satirizes the modern elite class and depicts extreme violence and depravity to achieve its subtextual meaning, Salo too pushes forth the use of extreme violence to excoriate Italy's social system of the 70s. The authority figures in “Salo” are fascist officials whose regimen of humiliation seems motivated less by sexual desire than by the exercise of total power and control. In Hostel, an organization called the Elite Hunting Club allows wealthy people to pay to mutilate tourists as a direct exercise in total power and control.
Salo takes place in an art-film universe of country houses, modern art, chamber music and fine furniture. It's exploitation canvased as sentimentality that Pasolini sells to the audience perfectly. Pasolini’s premise acknowledges the perverse erotic appeal of fascism, but his main concern was the rise of consumer capitalism and its ability to reduce human bodies to commodities. In Hostel, people are quite literally being sold as commodities to the elite. Although Salo does not fit into the direct lineage of torture porns contemporary gory aesthetics and generalized Hollywood production treatment of the 2000s, it absolutely is a preface to the genre itself.
Yes, I do think that Salo has more artistic merit than Human Centapide or any of the Saw movies. But my argument is that they both share similar subtexts that deserve acknowledgment. Sorry for the essay, I love talking about cinema. Take care yo.