0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Impish sausage is definitely gonna blow up as a euphemism this year
You're a straight up fucking idiot. So it's all cosmetic, not the enhanced lethality of the features and attachments. Silencers and suppressors are really spooky. Bayonets are really spooky. The ar15 was created to kill people more effectively than the m14. that's it. Why does the general public need that?And good job bringing up VT and columbine, 2 glaring examples of the need for more strict gun control.
Quote from: Level 60 Dwarf Paladin on June 15, 2016, 12:23:47 PMExpand QuoteYou're a straight up fucking idiot. So it's all cosmetic, not the enhanced lethality of the features and attachments. Silencers and suppressors are really spooky. Bayonets are really spooky. The ar15 was created to kill people more effectively than the m14. that's it. Why does the general public need that?And good job bringing up VT and columbine, 2 glaring examples of the need for more strict gun control.[close]Did I read that wrong earlier when you said you were in the armed forces, yet you just used the words silencer and suppressor as if they're two different things? So your logic is that only the modern day mafia (the police) and the American military industrial complex should be allowed to have any gun of their liking, while the American public should be under stricter gun laws which will still not prevent them from obtaining guns and killing each other. Cultural conditions are the most important factors in a nation's crime rate, not gun laws. Take a good look at the social fabric of this country, there's your answer.
You're a straight up fucking idiot. So it's all cosmetic, not the enhanced lethality of the features and attachments. Silencers and suppressors are really spooky. Bayonets are really spooky. The ar15 was created to kill people more effectively than the m14. that's it. Why does the general public need that?And good job bringing up VT and columbine, 2 glaring examples of the need for more strict gun control.[close]
you never know about pre-cum
How do all these nutjobs get hold of AK's?
Yes, I know that a lot of AK's are sold on the black market. I was under the impression that Americans who put videos on Youtube with fully automatic rifles own them legally. Am I just plain wrong or are you allowed to own them in the states?
<<~<<{[((()))]}>>~>>
Quote from: Main on June 15, 2016, 09:52:43 PMExpand QuoteQuote from: Level 60 Dwarf Paladin on June 15, 2016, 12:23:47 PMExpand QuoteYou're a straight up fucking idiot. So it's all cosmetic, not the enhanced lethality of the features and attachments. Silencers and suppressors are really spooky. Bayonets are really spooky. The ar15 was created to kill people more effectively than the m14. that's it. Why does the general public need that?And good job bringing up VT and columbine, 2 glaring examples of the need for more strict gun control.[close]Did I read that wrong earlier when you said you were in the armed forces, yet you just used the words silencer and suppressor as if they're two different things? So your logic is that only the modern day mafia (the police) and the American military industrial complex should be allowed to have any gun of their liking, while the American public should be under stricter gun laws which will still not prevent them from obtaining guns and killing each other. Cultural conditions are the most important factors in a nation's crime rate, not gun laws. Take a good look at the social fabric of this country, there's your answer.[close]I didn't read passed your silencer comment. We don't use them, but here fuckhead.http://www.gunsandammo.com/gear-accessories/suppressors/suppressors-arent-silencers/
Quote from: Level 60 Dwarf Paladin on June 15, 2016, 12:23:47 PMExpand QuoteYou're a straight up fucking idiot. So it's all cosmetic, not the enhanced lethality of the features and attachments. Silencers and suppressors are really spooky. Bayonets are really spooky. The ar15 was created to kill people more effectively than the m14. that's it. Why does the general public need that?And good job bringing up VT and columbine, 2 glaring examples of the need for more strict gun control.[close]Did I read that wrong earlier when you said you were in the armed forces, yet you just used the words silencer and suppressor as if they're two different things? So your logic is that only the modern day mafia (the police) and the American military industrial complex should be allowed to have any gun of their liking, while the American public should be under stricter gun laws which will still not prevent them from obtaining guns and killing each other. Cultural conditions are the most important factors in a nation's crime rate, not gun laws. Take a good look at the social fabric of this country, there's your answer.[close]
Jesus Christ... I just read that modern day mafia comment.
Quote from: Level 60 Dwarf Paladin on June 16, 2016, 10:02:17 AMExpand QuoteJesus Christ... I just read that modern day mafia comment. [close]There's places you can go to that help you learn how to read better.
Jesus Christ... I just read that modern day mafia comment. [close]
While you guys are trippin about guns...
why did they put that anonymous guy in special makeup ? this is a tragedy, not a jackass skit. why didn't they put him in low lighting or pixel him? i'm not a conspiracy person, but that was just really odd...especially since they made him look so weird
Turns out he was most likely a plain old Islamic terrorist, not a closeted gay man with an inexplicable hatred of Puerto Ricans. "FBI investigators say they have found no evidence that Orlando shooter had gay lovers"http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-orlando-gay-fbi-20160623-snap-story.html