So this woman needs the protection afforded to vulnerable adults? Ok, then get her in a group home or other monitored living situation.
Careless is careless. Trusting someone you barely know with your health is careless.
neither was i responding directly to a certain post post you've made, also i've made it clear i'm not talking about the women that accuse stuckey. i'm talking about the fact that even if someone is careless(doesn't need to be stupidity) it's not like they deserve what's coming towards them.
the woman did what she thought was taking care, i never said she needs to be protected, like a child. she made an adult decision. just because it doesn't apply to your simple, if coherent logic, doesn't mean stuckey was allowed to do what he does and that it's ok to blame her for it.
you are basically repeating the victim blaming that people employ when they say shit like "if women don't want to be raped, they should stop wearing sexy clothes." normal people don't rape every person they are sexually attracted to. a predatory mindset is needed for that, same when you knowingly infect others with stds. stuckey is accountable, not the woman. your own personal parameters aside, the laws are pretty clear on this. your line of thinking when present in police only helps to keep this shit under wraps and to disenfranchise victims of sexual abuse to come forward.
it's not just about protection, we need to empower victims(of every sex and gender!) of scumbags to come forward, and when they do, they can't just be dismissed as "knowing what was coming to them". that's just my opinion though, and fwiw i'll gladly leave it at that and agree to disagree with you from here on out.
EDIT: fixed punctuation