Wenning footage makes me want some stage 9s or 10s. Van Wastell, too. Loved those things. Like Ok, I thought 10s came out in the mid 2000’s.
I knew immediately stage 11s were too tall, but you can’t beat plain old cast. Everyone I know who tried the mids/forged hated them as they were chasing that stage 9/10 feel.
this happens to me, the wanting of gear from a specific era.
i actually liked 9/10s, and would skate them fairly frequently, back when. if i’m being honest, i probably skated better on those, than what i was regularly trying to setup (i was trying to learn bs that i couldn’t do, like switch varial heels and what not, and i’d skate small ass boards, venture 5.0s, little wheels. when the indy’s would come out, it’d be on something ‘massive’ like an 8+ deck, and maybe 54s, and the tricks i could do, i’d actually do. i didn’t understand that, that is what i should use, and that i was just never gonna get that 3 mph switch hardflip).
Van Wastell, Wenning, old Julien, Rick Howard (mouse in general), McBride, mike graham and then in recent times Hjalte, Grady Smith, Dick Rizzo, in between the two eras there is a Bobby Worrest setup video with a great flatground switched tre that has had me interested on several occasions.
i’ve never had a consistently good/favored stage 11 based setup, but several brief/torrid/short short short term love affairs with a few. only with the cast, which doesn’t make sense with the height thing.
in the interest of madness i skated my only set of stage 11s last night, but they are 169s, hollow/forged, feel weird, too big obviously.
i was just dicking around in a parking lot and a few other takeaways were that when i skate very infrequently, the comically large skateboards are much easier to kickflip than even my ‘regular’ 8.25 setup, and dragons even in a relatively smooth asphalt lot, feel significantly smoother/faster, than f4 99s.
embarrassing