Author Topic: Spitfire formula four  (Read 1058908 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

CINCINNATI

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 1511
  • Rep: 116
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #2580 on: April 23, 2020, 04:16:02 PM »
been on f4 classics the last few years after riding conical fulls before that. just picked up a pair of classic fulls in 56. we'll see how they feel.

Boog

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 805
  • Rep: 253
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #2581 on: April 23, 2020, 04:50:38 PM »
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
For anyone who's ridden both conical full and tablets, do they handle roughish ground the same? they have almost identical contact patch (21.5mm conicals vs 21mm tablet) so theoretically they should ride the same but tablets are lighter so should be easier to flip?

Hoping someone who's ridden both can hook me up with some info. Thanks.
[close]

They both feel pretty similar in regards to regular riding. The tablets are better for flipping and conical fulls are better all around wheel for parks and street.
[close]

thanks bro. if they feel the same-ish cruising over pavement I think I'll dig the tablets. I'm a giant riding an 8.75 so any weight I can shave helps, even if it's only in my head.
No problem man  Yeah they feel pretty much the same. I think you'll like them. Definitely worth trying.

Onevia

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 43
  • Rep: 6
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #2582 on: April 23, 2020, 06:10:47 PM »
Just got some Embers 54mm 99a Conical Fulls. Interested to see how different they feel on rough shit vs. the 51mm 99a Radial Slims I have now.

munchbox

  • Trade Count: (+8)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 3819
  • Rep: 1178
  • like….? brunch
  • Bronze Topic Start Bronze Topic Start : Start a topic with over 1,000 replies.
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #2583 on: April 23, 2020, 08:12:06 PM »
Just got some Embers 54mm 99a Conical Fulls. Interested to see how different they feel on rough shit vs. the 51mm 99a Radial Slims I have now.
just made this switch in shape and the difference is night and day. better ride, grip, and control with the conical fulls.   I did like the radial slims but they are a pain in the ass for crusty streets
while cool-guying is a real phenomenon, studies show that 83% of all cool-guying incidents can be attributed to the cool-guyee being an awkward weirdo

jay_nev

  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 3693
  • Rep: 310
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #2584 on: April 23, 2020, 08:26:18 PM »
Compare the specs. Tablets and conical fills have same riding surface at 54mm. But over that conical fulls really fill out.

https://www.spitfirewheels.com/formulafour/

fakiefs180

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 2455
  • Rep: 813
    • a short part avatar image
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #2585 on: April 25, 2020, 01:14:02 PM »
Expand Quote
Just got some Embers 54mm 99a Conical Fulls. Interested to see how different they feel on rough shit vs. the 51mm 99a Radial Slims I have now.
[close]
just made this switch in shape and the difference is night and day. better ride, grip, and control with the conical fulls.   I did like the radial slims but they are a pain in the ass for crusty streets

I think it depends on the size of the wheels. And personal preference of course, I found the conical fulls a bit too massive, especially for nose and tailslides. Now I am on Radial Slims and these are awesome so far. Both sets in 54 mm. Just tweaked my ankle, so I am out for a few days/weeks.

Juanjo789

  • Guest
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #2586 on: April 25, 2020, 02:44:15 PM »
has anybody tried 58mm Classic Shape F4? Are they good?

moonordie

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 7348
  • Rep: 8
  • ɹǝʌǝɹoɟ lloᴚ
  • Bronze Topic Start Bronze Topic Start : Start a topic with over 1,000 replies.
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #2587 on: April 25, 2020, 03:55:50 PM »
has anybody tried 58mm Classic Shape F4? Are they good?
Yup, they turn into Conicals when they're 54mm
Sir, I'm going to politely, but firmly, ask you and your common sense to leave this establishment.

Juanjo789

  • Guest
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #2588 on: April 25, 2020, 05:17:47 PM »
Expand Quote
has anybody tried 58mm Classic Shape F4? Are they good?
[close]
Yup, they turn into Conicals when they're 54mm
could you explain that a little more? im intrigued

jay_nev

  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 3693
  • Rep: 310
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #2589 on: April 25, 2020, 06:11:53 PM »
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
has anybody tried 58mm Classic Shape F4? Are they good?
[close]
Yup, they turn into Conicals when they're 54mm
[close]
could you explain that a little more? im intrigued
as they wear down the contact patch gets wider. Because of the classic shape.

Fred Gerwer Frank Gall

  • Guest
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #2590 on: April 25, 2020, 06:58:29 PM »
I love that about the classics.

Skart

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 469
  • Rep: -33
  • Ham control
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #2591 on: April 25, 2020, 07:14:57 PM »
Idk why but I bought 58 bigheads a while back. Might as well start using them
i need a break from this thread dawg. knowledge doesnt feel like power anymore

jay_nev

  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 3693
  • Rep: 310
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #2592 on: April 25, 2020, 07:26:20 PM »
Idk why but I bought 58 bigheads a while back. Might as well start using them
was looking at a pair of bigheads on eBay and thinking about this exact wear down process

Diocletian

  • Guest
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #2593 on: April 25, 2020, 08:30:28 PM »
I have a brand new set of classic formula swirls 58mm if anyone wants em, PM me. I’ll never use em.

munchbox

  • Trade Count: (+8)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 3819
  • Rep: 1178
  • like….? brunch
  • Bronze Topic Start Bronze Topic Start : Start a topic with over 1,000 replies.
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #2594 on: April 25, 2020, 09:27:19 PM »
Idk why but I bought 58 bigheads a while back. Might as well start using them
if wheelbite wasnt a thing without risers id be all over those
while cool-guying is a real phenomenon, studies show that 83% of all cool-guying incidents can be attributed to the cool-guyee being an awkward weirdo

jay_nev

  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 3693
  • Rep: 310
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #2595 on: April 28, 2020, 01:24:07 PM »
been on f4 classics the last few years after riding conical fulls before that. just picked up a pair of classic fulls in 56. we'll see how they feel.
any update on the classic full shape?

Saint Coke

  • Guest
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #2596 on: April 30, 2020, 05:15:54 PM »
Should I get 101 conical fulls or 101 classics 53mm?

munchbox

  • Trade Count: (+8)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 3819
  • Rep: 1178
  • like….? brunch
  • Bronze Topic Start Bronze Topic Start : Start a topic with over 1,000 replies.
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #2597 on: April 30, 2020, 05:33:34 PM »
Should I get 101 conical fulls or 101 classics 53mm?
conical full
while cool-guying is a real phenomenon, studies show that 83% of all cool-guying incidents can be attributed to the cool-guyee being an awkward weirdo

tzhangdox

  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 2514
  • Rep: 783
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #2598 on: April 30, 2020, 05:37:39 PM »
Should I get 101 conical fulls or 101 classics 53mm?

depends on what you skate and what you want out of your wheel, though either way I much prefer 99s

Saint Coke

  • Guest
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #2599 on: April 30, 2020, 05:40:31 PM »
Expand Quote
Should I get 101 conical fulls or 101 classics 53mm?
[close]
conical full
I could see why, I'm almost done with my set of conical 99 53's (Which are now 46mm) The conical fulls roll better imo but I've never skated classics.

Saint Coke

  • Guest
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #2600 on: April 30, 2020, 05:41:49 PM »
Expand Quote
Should I get 101 conical fulls or 101 classics 53mm?
[close]

depends on what you skate and what you want out of your wheel, though either way I much prefer 99s
Idek what I skate, Mainly hills and some flat ground, I wanna try to skate vert.

tzhangdox

  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 2514
  • Rep: 783
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #2601 on: April 30, 2020, 05:52:50 PM »
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Should I get 101 conical fulls or 101 classics 53mm?
[close]

depends on what you skate and what you want out of your wheel, though either way I much prefer 99s
[close]
Idek what I skate, Mainly hills and some flat ground, I wanna try to skate vert.

Classics are worse on shitty ground, but have a slimmer profile and a lighter so a bit easier to flip than chunky wheels. Conical fulls will handle hills and probably tranny better. Classics with the rounded edge seem to slappy a bit easier imo. You also get a little more truck space with classics for grinds.

Saint Coke

  • Guest
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #2602 on: April 30, 2020, 06:01:15 PM »
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Should I get 101 conical fulls or 101 classics 53mm?
[close]

depends on what you skate and what you want out of your wheel, though either way I much prefer 99s
[close]
Idek what I skate, Mainly hills and some flat ground, I wanna try to skate vert.
[close]
Where I live in Iowa the ground can get a little crusty but other than that it's fine. I live in a small farm town, so most of the streets here were built 200 sum years ago.

Classics are worse on shitty ground, but have a slimmer profile and a lighter so a bit easier to flip than chunky wheels. Conical fulls will handle hills and probably tranny better. Classics with the rounded edge seem to slappy a bit easier imo. You also get a little more truck space with classics for grinds.

shmazz

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 18
  • Rep: 3
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #2603 on: April 30, 2020, 10:04:58 PM »
They’re real good. I think they’re a bit more expensive than most of their other wheels, but they do last a long time and wear out nicely without any flat spots.

Diocletian

  • Guest
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #2604 on: April 30, 2020, 11:13:06 PM »
Been riding F4’s since they came out but for some reason never tried the conical or conical full shape. I think I ventured into trying some radials and radial slims but always went back to the good ol’ classic shape. Well, two sessions now on some 56mm 99a conical fulls and man...these are the best fuckin wheels. Super loud chirp, easier to break into a powerslide than the classic shape, yet still grips when I need them to. Might be a conical shaped wheel convert now. 

tzhangdox

  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 2514
  • Rep: 783
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #2605 on: April 30, 2020, 11:13:53 PM »
good timing

moonordie

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 7348
  • Rep: 8
  • ɹǝʌǝɹoɟ lloᴚ
  • Bronze Topic Start Bronze Topic Start : Start a topic with over 1,000 replies.
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #2606 on: May 01, 2020, 02:27:44 PM »
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Should I get 101 conical fulls or 101 classics 53mm?
[close]

depends on what you skate and what you want out of your wheel, though either way I much prefer 99s
[close]
Idek what I skate, Mainly hills and some flat ground, I wanna try to skate vert.
Conical full, on 99, is your wheel
Sir, I'm going to politely, but firmly, ask you and your common sense to leave this establishment.

Saint Coke

  • Guest
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #2607 on: May 01, 2020, 06:00:58 PM »
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Should I get 101 conical fulls or 101 classics 53mm?
[close]

depends on what you skate and what you want out of your wheel, though either way I much prefer 99s
[close]
Idek what I skate, Mainly hills and some flat ground, I wanna try to skate vert.
[close]
Conical full, on 99, is your wheel
99 feels a bit soft to me though, I rely on that extra bit of slide on 180's and powerslides, perhaps you're right...

Fred Gerwer Frank Gall

  • Guest
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #2608 on: May 01, 2020, 06:33:23 PM »
F4 99s slide just fine. I'm on some 101s right now and I definitely prefer the 99s. The 101s are just a little too icy for me. More of a ledgetarian wheel than a hill bomber.

Saint Coke

  • Guest
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #2609 on: May 01, 2020, 07:30:18 PM »
F4 99s slide just fine. I'm on some 101s right now and I definitely prefer the 99s. The 101s are just a little too icy for me. More of a ledgetarian wheel than a hill bomber.
I could see that, I had a pair of 101 conical fulls that felt really good on certain hills, depends on the type of concrete, if it was that smooth tar stuff then it felt way to icy.