Author Topic: Spitfire formula four  (Read 1059219 times)

0 Members and 9 Guests are viewing this topic.

fakiefs180

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 2455
  • Rep: 813
    • a short part avatar image
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #3780 on: January 12, 2022, 12:15:31 PM »
Damn Oski's pro wheels look incredible. Would make for a nice sticker or shirt.

Stupid question now..

Will I feel a difference between 99 and 101 spits?
Never had 101 duro wheels before and I am not sure I would like them.

101 duro = sliding better, rattling my bones more?

I skate mostly on crusty streets, but maybe 101d conical fulls would feel nice there?

manysnakes

  • Guest
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #3781 on: January 12, 2022, 12:19:43 PM »
I live in the crusty Pacific Northwest and, although they’re ideal for skatepark concrete, I find the 101a to be too harsh for the streets here. 97a all the way for me, these days.

Mbrimson88

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 7594
  • Rep: 1553
  • Just another skate shop guy
  • Bronze Topic Start Bronze Topic Start : Start a topic with over 1,000 replies.
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #3782 on: January 12, 2022, 01:30:49 PM »
Damn Oski's pro wheels look incredible. Would make for a nice sticker or shirt.

Stupid question now..

Will I feel a difference between 99 and 101 spits?
Never had 101 duro wheels before and I am not sure I would like them.

101 duro = sliding better, rattling my bones more?

I skate mostly on crusty streets, but maybe 101d conical fulls would feel nice there?

I live in the crusty Pacific Northwest and, although they’re ideal for skatepark concrete, I find the 101a to be too harsh for the streets here. 97a all the way for me, these days.


I find the 99s to be just the most stable and constant wheel, with 101s tending to be a bit up and down with the consistency over the years.  Of three sets of 101s (all the same wheels) I have set up , one feels super grippy (even more than 97s) one is really slippery and the other is kind of sticky at times but will slide more at other times, so it is a bit funny, whereas the 99s have always felt the same, through many different sets.


I recently set up some 54 mm 97 duro conical full wheels and they sure do feel pretty good on a lot of things, but I think the 99s are still my favourite.  I do have the Classic 97 duro 56 mm on a setup as well, but that was more just an experiment with bigger transition and slippery new bowls.

The 97s take the edge off everything, be it crust or slippery smooth.  I sort of got the feeling they were a little bit slower but others had a go of my boards and couldn't tell with speed either way.


There are people who swear by 101s and others like me who prefer 99s, neither is right or wrong as they are just two different types, but also very similar and close in feel.

Gone since 1988.  I talk too much about skateboards.  Sorry.

jimgrude

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 226
  • Rep: 70
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #3783 on: January 12, 2022, 08:32:24 PM »
Damn Oski's pro wheels look incredible. Would make for a nice sticker or shirt.

Stupid question now..

Will I feel a difference between 99 and 101 spits?
Never had 101 duro wheels before and I am not sure I would like them.

101 duro = sliding better, rattling my bones more?

I skate mostly on crusty streets, but maybe 101d conical fulls would feel nice there?

In my opinion, 101 takes away a lot of the benefits of the F4 formula. 99 and below is where you get that great combination of speed, grip and satisfying slide. If you want to try a 101, I'd recommend STF's, but since you're mostly hitting the crust, I'd stay on 99. I run 99a 56mm Conical Fulls on my crust setup and love it, but might try 97 next time in a slightly smaller, narrower shape.

listentoaheartbeat

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 1083
  • Rep: 191
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #3784 on: January 13, 2022, 11:02:01 AM »
I am 100% committed to 99A except for slippery indoor skateparks and wooden miniramps. I found 97A to be perfect for that. I don’t skate super crusty spots but on rough asphalt I much prefer 99A over 97A. The latter feel slow and grip too much when sliding flat ground tricks.

FrontsideFrank

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 85
  • Rep: 101
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #3785 on: January 13, 2022, 04:58:44 PM »
 bounce back and forth between the 101s and 99s. 99 is definitely a touch friendlier in the streets, but a wide contact patch 101 still works without rattling your feet to sleep. Both have a pretty similar grip to slide ratio, with the 101s being just a hair easier to break loose. I rolled around on a buddy's 97s for a bit and I wasn't a huge fan. They're still better than other 97s out there, but they were a little grippier than I'd want (without being a whole lot more comfortable/softer than the 99s).

braksabbath

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 272
  • Rep: 193
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #3786 on: January 14, 2022, 02:07:16 AM »
What shape for 99s? I got conical fulls in 56mm/97a for the slippery indoor park and street crust but need something faster and maybe lighter on good concrete parks

Mbrimson88

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 7594
  • Rep: 1553
  • Just another skate shop guy
  • Bronze Topic Start Bronze Topic Start : Start a topic with over 1,000 replies.
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #3787 on: January 14, 2022, 03:16:45 AM »
What shape for 99s? I got conical fulls in 56mm/97a for the slippery indoor park and street crust but need something faster and maybe lighter on good concrete parks

If you like the edge on the Conical Full wheels, you could always get the same in 99, but if you wanted a little more go, I would usually say Classics are where it is at, or even Classic Full if you wanted a little wider in the same rounded shape.

There are almost too many options if people are not sure, but the rounder edge will be easier on everything and not stick so much when on coping or edges the way the Conical Full and squared shapes tend to do, which is different to how much they slide or grip on the riding surface, but again there is the smaller contact patch on Classics compared to the wider contact patch on Conical Full wheels, and all the rest in between.


Edit:  If you hadn't seen the full size chart earlier, there are a few throughout the last ten or so pages, but didn't come up on a search, apart from Page 117 with this post


https://www.slapmagazine.com/index.php?topic=68020.msg3573166;topicseen#msg3573166


There is a better, high res full card image somewhere too, that gets reposted every now and then with all the shapes.

« Last Edit: January 14, 2022, 03:32:38 AM by Mbrimson88 »
Gone since 1988.  I talk too much about skateboards.  Sorry.

braksabbath

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 272
  • Rep: 193
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #3788 on: January 14, 2022, 08:42:24 AM »
There are def too many shapes. Didn’t know about classic fulls, that’s the one thanks.

listentoaheartbeat

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 1083
  • Rep: 191
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #3789 on: January 17, 2022, 01:39:02 AM »
Expand Quote
What shape for 99s? I got conical fulls in 56mm/97a for the slippery indoor park and street crust but need something faster and maybe lighter on good concrete parks
[close]
There are almost too many options if people are not sure, but the rounder edge will be easier on everything and not stick so much when on coping or edges the way the Conical Full and squared shapes tend to do [...].

I feel conical/square vs. rounded on coping is the most noticeable difference between the shapes. Personally, I prefer the solid lock in of Conical Fulls over Classics when skating transition. My grinds are noticeably faster and longer with Classics, however I need to focus on locking in much more and still wipe out from time to time. Therefore my confidence to go faster in the first place is higher with Conical Fulls.

There is a better, high res full card image somewhere too, that gets reposted every now and then with all the shapes.

https://www.slapmagazine.com/index.php?topic=68020.msg3587166#msg3587166

TastyBurrito

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 3199
  • Rep: 950
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #3790 on: January 17, 2022, 09:54:47 AM »
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
What shape for 99s? I got conical fulls in 56mm/97a for the slippery indoor park and street crust but need something faster and maybe lighter on good concrete parks
[close]
There are almost too many options if people are not sure, but the rounder edge will be easier on everything and not stick so much when on coping or edges the way the Conical Full and squared shapes tend to do [...].

I feel conical/square vs. rounded on coping is the most noticeable difference between the shapes. Personally, I prefer the solid lock in of Conical Fulls over Classics when skating transition. My grinds are noticeably faster and longer with Classics, however I need to focus on locking in much more and still wipe out from time to time. Therefore my confidence to go faster in the first place is higher with Conical Fulls.
[close]

I’ll agree with this. Went from conical fulls to radial fulls and the wide wheel and rounded edges send me sailing over coping — metal and pool. I can say the lock-in felt better with the conical fulls, but getting over the coping easier is my preference.

Mbrimson88

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 7594
  • Rep: 1553
  • Just another skate shop guy
  • Bronze Topic Start Bronze Topic Start : Start a topic with over 1,000 replies.
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #3791 on: January 17, 2022, 02:40:42 PM »
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
What shape for 99s? I got conical fulls in 56mm/97a for the slippery indoor park and street crust but need something faster and maybe lighter on good concrete parks
[close]
There are almost too many options if people are not sure, but the rounder edge will be easier on everything and not stick so much when on coping or edges the way the Conical Full and squared shapes tend to do [...].
[close]

I feel conical/square vs. rounded on coping is the most noticeable difference between the shapes. Personally, I prefer the solid lock in of Conical Fulls over Classics when skating transition. My grinds are noticeably faster and longer with Classics, however I need to focus on locking in much more and still wipe out from time to time. Therefore my confidence to go faster in the first place is higher with Conical Fulls.

Expand Quote
There is a better, high res full card image somewhere too, that gets reposted every now and then with all the shapes.
[close]

https://www.slapmagazine.com/index.php?topic=68020.msg3587166#msg3587166


That's the one!!!!!!

I feel like you could post that on every second page and it would not be a bad thing.


I would repost it, but it was your post so seeing as you are still active, I think that would be a bit weird.

The other thing is when people (like me) go looking for SPITFIRE SHAPE CHART that doesn't come up, so if possible could you add those words to your original post, or repost that chart again - still the same link, etc - with those words, as that would be a lot easier for anyone to find.


I also wonder if they will make a chart or anything with Radial Full and Classic Full on it, or if they are just "specialty shapes" so they wouldn't appear on any normal full chart, not to mention they are running out of room too.

Gone since 1988.  I talk too much about skateboards.  Sorry.

sharkin

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 2746
  • Rep: 507
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #3792 on: January 17, 2022, 06:53:20 PM »
I was looking for width dimensions of the radial full 60mm and end up on a UK shops page from the Google search that was using that picture I uploaded here of the size chart. It was edited a bit, but there was scratch and crease that matched up perfectly with the pic I posted here.

Shout out to whatever shop that was that browses slap gear threads for the product pages. It’s a small world after all

thanksgiving

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 443
  • Rep: 230
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #3793 on: January 17, 2022, 07:55:53 PM »
Rumor is
Sorry but you are not allowed to view spoiler contents.
Conical Fulls coming this Summer.
« Last Edit: January 17, 2022, 09:29:17 PM by thanksgiving »

manysnakes

  • Guest
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #3794 on: January 18, 2022, 06:40:10 AM »
Rumor is
Sorry but you are not allowed to view spoiler contents.
Conical Fulls coming this Summer.

A 60mm 97a wheel would be hilarious. I know so many crusty dudes who would buy that.

Mbrimson88

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 7594
  • Rep: 1553
  • Just another skate shop guy
  • Bronze Topic Start Bronze Topic Start : Start a topic with over 1,000 replies.
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #3795 on: January 18, 2022, 02:21:27 PM »
Expand Quote
Rumor is
Sorry but you are not allowed to view spoiler contents.
Conical Fulls coming this Summer.
[close]

A 60mm 97a wheel would be hilarious. I know so many crusty dudes who would buy that.


There is definitely a market for that size, shape and duro.

As it is a lot of people are unable to get their hands on the 58mm Conical Full in 97 duro here in AU, but that would be even better actually coming out in Formula Four 97 for the slippery ramp stuff, especially the vert guys who are not so able bodied.

Gone since 1988.  I talk too much about skateboards.  Sorry.

white guy in a durag

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 628
  • Rep: 231
  • 0 days since last ankle injury
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #3796 on: January 18, 2022, 02:27:33 PM »
how will slimeballs ever recover

braksabbath

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 272
  • Rep: 193
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #3797 on: January 18, 2022, 02:43:16 PM »
Expand Quote
Rumor is
Sorry but you are not allowed to view spoiler contents.
Conical Fulls coming this Summer.
[close]

A 60mm 97a wheel would be hilarious. I know so many crusty dudes who would buy that.


typeischeap

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 134
  • Rep: 116
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #3798 on: January 20, 2022, 04:08:11 PM »
Oski Radial 55 vs. Classic 56 vs. Conical Full 54. Seems like the radial is almost an exact average/tweener of the classic and cf. It's either the perfect shape that does everything well or the worst shape that does nothing well (this is mostly a joke). Gear madness at its highest level I would say.

Unapologetic shoes and gear nerd deep into my 3rd era of skateboarding every day.

listentoaheartbeat

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 1083
  • Rep: 191
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #3799 on: January 21, 2022, 06:07:49 AM »
Oski Radial 55 vs. Classic 56 vs. Conical Full 54. Seems like the radial is almost an exact average/tweener of the classic and cf. It's either the perfect shape that does everything well or the worst shape that does nothing well (this is mostly a joke). Gear madness at its highest level I would say.



Thanks for these, very useful. Might have to try the Oskis.

Jowiththeflow

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 56
  • Rep: 18
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #3800 on: January 21, 2022, 09:36:51 AM »
Oski Radial 55 vs. Classic 56 vs. Conical Full 54. Seems like the radial is almost an exact average/tweener of the classic and cf. It's either the perfect shape that does everything well or the worst shape that does nothing well (this is mostly a joke). Gear madness at its highest level I would say.



The Radial Full is by far the best shape, imo.
They have a solid riding surface right out of the box (unlike the classic), and they don't lock in as much as a conical.
I love that they make me confident enough to really lean into (smith)grinds again, because I fell I can get out easily!

nekro

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 95
  • Rep: 9
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #3801 on: January 22, 2022, 10:39:35 AM »
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Rumor is
Sorry but you are not allowed to view spoiler contents.
Conical Fulls coming this Summer.
[close]

A 60mm 97a wheel would be hilarious. I know so many crusty dudes who would buy that.
[close]



Hilarious that you think that would be hilarious.  Standard size/durometer back in the day and works perfectly.

manysnakes

  • Guest
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #3802 on: January 22, 2022, 11:24:34 AM »
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Rumor is
Sorry but you are not allowed to view spoiler contents.
Conical Fulls coming this Summer.
[close]

A 60mm 97a wheel would be hilarious. I know so many crusty dudes who would buy that.
[close]


[close]

Hilarious that you think that would be hilarious.  Standard size/durometer back in the day and works perfectly.

That’s exactly why it would be funny. Right back where we began, skating 97a, 60mm wheels on 9” wide boards in a subterranean parking garage.

Schinken

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 167
  • Rep: 105
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #3803 on: January 23, 2022, 01:59:18 AM »
Might be of interest. Size/shape chart from my latest purchase.

Mbrimson88

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 7594
  • Rep: 1553
  • Just another skate shop guy
  • Bronze Topic Start Bronze Topic Start : Start a topic with over 1,000 replies.
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #3804 on: January 23, 2022, 03:23:28 AM »
Might be of interest. Size/shape chart from my latest purchase.

That's rad and thanks for posting.

Was this from the Kader wheels?

I see Radial Slim is still in there @rocklobster and Radial Full replaces the Radial info.


It is better to upload using the "Add image to post" which should be directly under the type box, so it is a much higher res image and hosted on the free site, vs files attached on the Slap server.


EDIT: 


2022 Spitfire chart with Radial Full info from @Schinken


I just changed the link to the hi res version you uploaded.

https://imgbb.com/jJGKBDf



« Last Edit: January 23, 2022, 01:59:37 PM by Mbrimson88 »
Gone since 1988.  I talk too much about skateboards.  Sorry.

typeischeap

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 134
  • Rep: 116
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #3805 on: January 23, 2022, 07:39:00 AM »
Here's the one from the Oskis if it helps...

Unapologetic shoes and gear nerd deep into my 3rd era of skateboarding every day.

Schinken

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 167
  • Rep: 105
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #3806 on: January 23, 2022, 07:56:03 AM »
Expand Quote
Might be of interest. Size/shape chart from my latest purchase.
[close]

That's rad and thanks for posting.

Was this from the Kader wheels?

I see Radial Slim is still in there @rocklobster and Radial Full replaces the Radial info.


It is better to upload using the "Add image to post" which should be directly under the type box, so it is a much higher res image and hosted on the free site, vs files attached on the Slap server.

I just uploaded your pic then, but I will remove it if you upload the hi res version.





Yes, this chart was from those kader wheels.

« Last Edit: January 23, 2022, 08:18:49 AM by Schinken »

Schinken

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 167
  • Rep: 105
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #3807 on: January 23, 2022, 08:22:51 AM »


[Img] didn't work, here is the link
https://ibb.co/jJGKBDf

munchbox

  • Trade Count: (+8)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 3819
  • Rep: 1178
  • like….? brunch
  • Bronze Topic Start Bronze Topic Start : Start a topic with over 1,000 replies.
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #3808 on: January 23, 2022, 11:18:00 AM »
are the regular radials no more?
while cool-guying is a real phenomenon, studies show that 83% of all cool-guying incidents can be attributed to the cool-guyee being an awkward weirdo

listentoaheartbeat

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 1083
  • Rep: 191
Re: Spitfire formula four
« Reply #3809 on: January 23, 2022, 12:01:06 PM »
are the regular radials no more?

The new Oskis in 55 and 57 mm are Radials.