Expand Quote
Expand Quote
What is the lightest Thunder and how much lighter is it than the hollow Venture highs
I'm about to make the dive from Thunder to Venture so I've been looking at this stuff already.
My front and back nose slides are fine but my front and back tails always scrrrt and half the time I get bucked off the ledge. I'm sure my form is partially to blame, but I want to try a different truck to see how much the baseplate issue is messing me up (if at all)
According to Tactics...
Jesus, if this is accurate the 8.75 Thunder is lighter than the 7.6 Venture.
That's kinda making me rethink this experiment...
it’s dope that you shared the tactics info.
for a more apples to apples comparison, you would want to compare the venture v-lights to the thunder lights, not the hollow lights. thunder hollow lights: forged plate, hollow kingpin, AND hollow axle. venture v-lights: forged plate, hollow kingpin, solid axle.
for what it is worth, i’ve been a big forged plate hater. somehow that has completely reversed, i now prefer forged plates, but also prefer the solid axle. feels better when i grind (which is pretty rare and really crappy. but that’s my feeling).
My quick math and guesstimate from years of stressing over truck weight is that Thunder is around 5-10% lighter than a comparable Venture. Off Tactics:
Venture 5.2 HI V-Hollow - 323.8g
Thunder 147 Hollow Lights - 300.9g
Venture 5.6 V-Hollow - 333.2g
Thunder 148 Hollow Light - 324g
Works out to around 2.89 - 7.61% difference in the above examples. More than percentage points on weight I found the heft and pop feel of a board is influenced less by grams and more about how much they shift the wheelbase. And IMO weight starts becoming more pronounced above 8.25 truck sizes, those 8.5 trucks start feeling heavy but you could adapt to it over a few sessions.
Ben's summary of truck weight is helpful here.
Also I haven't ridden Thunders in close to 2 years, been on the Venture program and (almost) no thoughts of switching.