Author Topic: By the numbers part 2 - Appleyard vs. Janoski [Infographic]  (Read 5845 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Gideon Choi

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 475
  • Rep: 24
By the numbers part 2 - Appleyard vs. Janoski [Infographic]
« on: December 28, 2018, 12:15:54 PM »

zuma

  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 1694
  • Rep: 138
Re: By the numbers part 2 - Appleyard vs. Janoski [Infographic]
« Reply #1 on: December 28, 2018, 12:21:57 PM »
appleyard had a digital part i can t find and janoski had an expedition part you forgot to include

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KDprSaySDwM


Chatbot

  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 1001
  • Rep: -19
Re: By the numbers part 2 - Appleyard vs. Janoski [Infographic]
« Reply #2 on: December 28, 2018, 12:22:09 PM »
This is info I never knew I wanted to see. Props on this. Also, surprised neither did a switch tre at all.

I feel like this can be a section at Jenkemmag. You plan on doing any other skaters?

Gideon Choi

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 475
  • Rep: 24
Re: By the numbers part 2 - Appleyard vs. Janoski [Infographic]
« Reply #3 on: December 28, 2018, 12:25:00 PM »
appleyard had a digital part i can t find and janoski had an expedition part you forgot to include
Yes I considered adding, but Appleyard's Digital part had a bit too much b-roll so I left it out to keep it even at 5 vids each.

feedmeseymour

  • Guest
Re: By the numbers part 2 - Appleyard vs. Janoski [Infographic]
« Reply #4 on: December 28, 2018, 12:26:04 PM »
good work captain duck

Gideon Choi

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 475
  • Rep: 24
Re: By the numbers part 2 - Appleyard vs. Janoski [Infographic]
« Reply #5 on: December 28, 2018, 12:26:56 PM »
This is info I never knew I wanted to see. Props on this. Also, surprised neither did a switch tre at all.

I feel like this can be a section at Jenkemmag. You plan on doing any other skaters?

I did a breakdown of Menikmati awhile back.


Mongoloid

  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 2528
  • Rep: -805
Re: By the numbers part 2 - Appleyard vs. Janoski [Infographic]
« Reply #6 on: December 28, 2018, 12:42:19 PM »
This nerd shit warms the cockles of my cock.

Great stuff!
Never trust a man in a blue trench coat
Never drive a car when you're dead.

Bobby Peru

  • Mods
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 4064
  • Rep: 574
    • Community Push
  • SLAP OG SLAP OG : Been around since SLAP was a mag.
Re: By the numbers part 2 - Appleyard vs. Janoski [Infographic]
« Reply #7 on: December 28, 2018, 12:48:26 PM »
These are fun! Wild that they did nearly the same amount of tricks.

Was it you who did this with Fully Flared or someone else?

ChrisLambe94

  • Guest
Re: By the numbers part 2 - Appleyard vs. Janoski [Infographic]
« Reply #8 on: December 28, 2018, 12:51:08 PM »

tobal

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 211
  • Rep: -12
Re: By the numbers part 2 - Appleyard vs. Janoski [Infographic]
« Reply #9 on: December 28, 2018, 12:55:56 PM »
Thank you so much Gideon 🙏

Gideon Choi

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 475
  • Rep: 24
Re: By the numbers part 2 - Appleyard vs. Janoski [Infographic]
« Reply #10 on: December 28, 2018, 12:57:27 PM »
These are fun! Wild that they did nearly the same amount of tricks.

Was it you who did this with Fully Flared or someone else?

I did Menikmati, see posts above with the infographic on that one. I also did a quick breakdown (no graphic) Steve Williams The Reason

The stereotype is that Asians are good in math, well that's actually true for me as well.

I was re-watching Stevie's Transworld part in The Reason, obviously well-noted for his long lines and mostly filmed at Love Park. But this time around I couldn't help but dig a bit deeper and pull same interesting data from the video part. I had fun doing this and might make this a regular thing. Anyways, Stevie Williams part in The Reason:

  • Time duration of part = 4m 34s
  • Actual skating from Stevie = 2m 10s or 48% of total part
  • Rest of video part (intro, Kevin Taylor & Josh Kalis) = 2m 20s or 52%
  • Stevie's first line = 40s long or 31% of his skating or 15% of the total video part
  • Stevie's total video clips filmed = 14
  • 11 clips filmed @ LOVE / 2 clips @ The Pier / 1 clip @ Brooklyn Banks

MintySandwhich

  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 1980
  • Rep: -128
Re: By the numbers part 2 - Appleyard vs. Janoski [Infographic]
« Reply #11 on: December 28, 2018, 01:09:30 PM »
Brilliant, Gideon Choi
Really good work.

These are top-tier infographics. Have you ever worked with any publishers? Sorry if you have stated before.

nice weather

  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 2673
  • Rep: 533
  • SLAP OG SLAP OG : Been around since SLAP was a mag.
    Bronze Topic Start Bronze Topic Start : Start a topic with over 1,000 replies.
Re: By the numbers part 2 - Appleyard vs. Janoski [Infographic]
« Reply #12 on: December 28, 2018, 01:12:10 PM »
These are great. If things go the way they could I'll pick up a copy of your book at urban outfitters in ca. 2 years

Gideon Choi

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 475
  • Rep: 24
Re: By the numbers part 2 - Appleyard vs. Janoski [Infographic]
« Reply #13 on: December 28, 2018, 01:15:22 PM »
Brilliant, Gideon Choi
Really good work.

These are top-tier infographics. Have you ever worked with any publishers? Sorry if you have stated before.

I have not, I just do this as a hobby in my spare time and I really enjoy working in Excel. I started this one about 3 months ago and worked on it bit by bit. The idea with this one kickstarted when I noticed how few lines Appleyard films, and it went from there. I don't even remember why I added Janoski data so the fact they almost filmed the same about of tricks (238 vs. 237) tripped me out when I started working the numbers.

zuma

  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 1694
  • Rep: 138
Re: By the numbers part 2 - Appleyard vs. Janoski [Infographic]
« Reply #14 on: December 28, 2018, 01:17:23 PM »
Expand Quote
appleyard had a digital part i can t find and janoski had an expedition part you forgot to include
[close]
Yes I considered adding, but Appleyard's Digital part had a bit too much b-roll so I left it out to keep it even at 5 vids each.

no worries! cool idea anyway- also loved the menikmati one

Swithflip

  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 3722
  • Rep: -481
Re: By the numbers part 2 - Appleyard vs. Janoski [Infographic]
« Reply #15 on: December 28, 2018, 01:22:54 PM »
Appleyard had a part in photosinthesis.

Gideon Choi

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 475
  • Rep: 24
Re: By the numbers part 2 - Appleyard vs. Janoski [Infographic]
« Reply #16 on: December 28, 2018, 01:25:31 PM »
Appleyard had a part in photosinthesis.

Yeah looking back I should have added that one and Janoski's Alone part. But five is nice cleaner number haha

guest1

  • Guest
Re: By the numbers part 2 - Appleyard vs. Janoski [Infographic]
« Reply #17 on: December 28, 2018, 01:35:58 PM »
Iím impressed.  Would gnar you if I could.

Nate.Dog

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 118
  • Rep: -10
Re: By the numbers part 2 - Appleyard vs. Janoski [Infographic]
« Reply #18 on: December 28, 2018, 01:50:53 PM »
This is rad. Most commonly done/favorite tricks would be an interesting tidbit to add, like how many times janoski tre-flipped, switch flipped, or nollie frontside flipped, or how many times appleyard nollie heeled or nollie flipped into something, stuff like that.

doublesteveburger

  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 5987
  • Rep: 1259
Re: By the numbers part 2 - Appleyard vs. Janoski [Infographic]
« Reply #19 on: December 28, 2018, 01:54:47 PM »
yeah but how do you feel?

GAY

  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 14462
  • Rep: 2108
  • Those that SLAP, can't.
Re: By the numbers part 2 - Appleyard vs. Janoski [Infographic]
« Reply #20 on: December 28, 2018, 01:57:50 PM »
This is rad.

Gideon, have you ever used PowerBI? They've got me learning it at work and it's pretty rad.

Watson

  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 6267
  • Rep: 989
  • SLAP OG SLAP OG : Been around since SLAP was a mag.
Re: By the numbers part 2 - Appleyard vs. Janoski [Infographic]
« Reply #21 on: December 28, 2018, 01:58:43 PM »
Was it you who did this with Fully Flared or someone else?

I did the Fully Flared one forever ago. http://youwillsoon.blogspot.com/2008/04/fully-flared-statistical-analysis.html

After it came out even though it was shitting on Fully Flared, Kelly Bird posted on the Lakai site that he was looking to talk to the person who did it. I hit him up and did a modified version that was strictly numbers, no opinion and it made it into the Final Flare boxset book. For my contribution I got two pairs of Caroll Selects, as well as a pair of Lakai slippers, and eight Lakai shirts that I never wore.

Good stuff Gideon, I really like it.

Gideon Choi

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 475
  • Rep: 24
Re: By the numbers part 2 - Appleyard vs. Janoski [Infographic]
« Reply #22 on: December 28, 2018, 02:00:36 PM »
This is rad.

Gideon, have you ever used PowerBI? They've got me learning it at work and it's pretty rad.

I've looked into that one, but we use Tableau at my work. I'd viz the data through there but it's the company's license.

Gideon Choi

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 475
  • Rep: 24
Re: By the numbers part 2 - Appleyard vs. Janoski [Infographic]
« Reply #23 on: December 28, 2018, 02:02:47 PM »
Expand Quote
Was it you who did this with Fully Flared or someone else?
[close]

I did the Fully Flared one forever ago. http://youwillsoon.blogspot.com/2008/04/fully-flared-statistical-analysis.html

After it came out even though it was shitting on Fully Flared, Kelly Bird posted on the Lakai site that he was looking to talk to the person who did it. I hit him up and did a modified version that was strictly numbers, no opinion and it made it into the Final Flare boxset book. For my contribution I got two pairs of Caroll Selects, as well as a pair of Lakai slippers, and eight Lakai shirts that I never wore.

Good stuff Gideon, I really like it.

Whoa I've never seen this but it's awesome. Once you start you have to finish the work. That's cool you got product out of it. I've wanted to do one for Yeah Right as I feel like that video over-indexes with the amount of manny tricks in it.

Herm Worshnitz

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 15
  • Rep: 0
Re: By the numbers part 2 - Appleyard vs. Janoski [Infographic]
« Reply #24 on: December 28, 2018, 02:22:38 PM »
These are great, Gideon (and Watson).

I'd buy a zine or book should you ever feel inclined to put something together. The format suits my attention span perfectly.

mynameisnotjeff

  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 4612
  • Rep: 403
Re: By the numbers part 2 - Appleyard vs. Janoski [Infographic]
« Reply #25 on: December 28, 2018, 02:42:58 PM »
This is some of the most beautiful shit I ever witnessed. Gnar'd
Nothing I do deserves more than an iphone camera.

Kill_Yourself_Now

  • Guest
Re: By the numbers part 2 - Appleyard vs. Janoski [Infographic]
« Reply #26 on: December 28, 2018, 03:41:59 PM »


But still interesting.

SneakySecrets

  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 4367
  • Rep: 603
Re: By the numbers part 2 - Appleyard vs. Janoski [Infographic]
« Reply #27 on: December 28, 2018, 04:31:33 PM »
Woah, these are awesome man, great job.

Iím going to try and think up some other good ones.  Maybe something with Welcome to Hell or Photosynthesis?

fulltechnicalskizzy

  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 3091
  • Rep: 1295
Re: By the numbers part 2 - Appleyard vs. Janoski [Infographic]
« Reply #28 on: December 28, 2018, 04:44:04 PM »
have you ever used PowerBI
Gimme your password I got a joke but it only works from your account

roomservice

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 491
  • Rep: -103
Re: By the numbers part 2 - Appleyard vs. Janoski [Infographic]
« Reply #29 on: December 28, 2018, 06:17:03 PM »
Great stuff. looking forward to seeing more