Author Topic: Stevie Williams beefing with Weck  (Read 68008 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Gary Ate My Peanuts

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 626
  • Rep: -63
Re: Stevie Williams beefing with Weck
« Reply #690 on: December 18, 2019, 12:03:28 PM »
think it was false allegations, maybe?
that me too shit, the first few we all had our pitchforks out but after weinstein, woody allen and billy cosby, it started being innocent people like aziz ansari and others, i keep my judgement to a minimum.

Aziz was not innocent, and used his status to force himself upon women despite being told no.

There is a difference between Aziz (and that guy from rick and morty) where A. their offences were not as brutal and B. they took the blame, and made sincere apologies.

It's no surprise there was an uprising of cancel culture initially because that kind of shit went on for too long and the victims never got any justice so you were seeing persecution of people who were probably more in a grey area because everyone was looking at it as black or white.
tysm

no habla mango

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 322
  • Rep: -59
Re: Stevie Williams beefing with Weck
« Reply #691 on: December 18, 2019, 12:09:49 PM »
think it was false allegations, maybe?
that me too shit, the first few we all had our pitchforks out but after weinstein, woody allen and billy cosby, it started being innocent people like aziz ansari and others, i keep my judgement to a minimum.

Aziz was not innocent, and used his status to force himself upon women despite being told no.

There is a difference between Aziz (and that guy from rick and morty) where A. their offences were not as brutal and B. they took the blame, and made sincere apologies.

It's no surprise there was an uprising of cancel culture initially because that kind of shit went on for too long and the victims never got any justice so you were seeing persecution of people who were probably more in a grey area because everyone was looking at it as black or white.
i disagree. the girl could've left at any time. she turned down his advances but he kept trying. is it admirable? no. is it sexual assault? no.
he ended up w/ blueballs and she decided to exploit his fame for her blog the next day.
or who was it, lena dunham saying she was raped by a republican? 'oh, it wasn't nonconsensual but if i'd known he was that. ew'.
there's a lot of real ones but a good amount of fake ones too.

Gary Ate My Peanuts

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 626
  • Rep: -63
Re: Stevie Williams beefing with Weck
« Reply #692 on: December 18, 2019, 12:14:58 PM »
think it was false allegations, maybe?
that me too shit, the first few we all had our pitchforks out but after weinstein, woody allen and billy cosby, it started being innocent people like aziz ansari and others, i keep my judgement to a minimum.

Aziz was not innocent, and used his status to force himself upon women despite being told no.

There is a difference between Aziz (and that guy from rick and morty) where A. their offences were not as brutal and B. they took the blame, and made sincere apologies.

It's no surprise there was an uprising of cancel culture initially because that kind of shit went on for too long and the victims never got any justice so you were seeing persecution of people who were probably more in a grey area because everyone was looking at it as black or white.
i disagree. the girl could've left at any time. she turned down his advances but he kept trying. is it admirable? no. is it sexual assault? no.
he ended up w/ blueballs and she decided to exploit his fame for her blog the next day.
or who was it, lena dunham saying she was raped by a republican? 'oh, it wasn't nonconsensual but if i'd known he was that. ew'.
there's a lot of real ones but a good amount of fake ones too.

All I'll say is I think you're underestimating the power dynamic because yes in theory anyone could leave at any time in most sexual mishaps whether they're assault or not but it's not as easy as you're making it out to be.
tysm

no habla mango

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 322
  • Rep: -59
Re: Stevie Williams beefing with Weck
« Reply #693 on: December 18, 2019, 12:30:40 PM »
think it was false allegations, maybe?
that me too shit, the first few we all had our pitchforks out but after weinstein, woody allen and billy cosby, it started being innocent people like aziz ansari and others, i keep my judgement to a minimum.

Aziz was not innocent, and used his status to force himself upon women despite being told no.

There is a difference between Aziz (and that guy from rick and morty) where A. their offences were not as brutal and B. they took the blame, and made sincere apologies.

It's no surprise there was an uprising of cancel culture initially because that kind of shit went on for too long and the victims never got any justice so you were seeing persecution of people who were probably more in a grey area because everyone was looking at it as black or white.
i disagree. the girl could've left at any time. she turned down his advances but he kept trying. is it admirable? no. is it sexual assault? no.
he ended up w/ blueballs and she decided to exploit his fame for her blog the next day.
or who was it, lena dunham saying she was raped by a republican? 'oh, it wasn't nonconsensual but if i'd known he was that. ew'.
there's a lot of real ones but a good amount of fake ones too.

All I'll say is I think you're underestimating the power dynamic because yes in theory anyone could leave at any time in most sexual mishaps whether they're assault or not but it's not as easy as you're making it out to be.
he wasn't her boss, he didn't have any power at all. if he did, she wouldn't have ran and blogged about it the next day. also, nothing happened. he shot his shot, she blocked it. a little while later, he shot another shot and she blocked that. he didn't force her. he just wanted an orgasm and she wanted a rich, celebrity friend.

Gary Ate My Peanuts

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 626
  • Rep: -63
Re: Stevie Williams beefing with Weck
« Reply #694 on: December 18, 2019, 01:09:29 PM »
think it was false allegations, maybe?
that me too shit, the first few we all had our pitchforks out but after weinstein, woody allen and billy cosby, it started being innocent people like aziz ansari and others, i keep my judgement to a minimum.

Aziz was not innocent, and used his status to force himself upon women despite being told no.

There is a difference between Aziz (and that guy from rick and morty) where A. their offences were not as brutal and B. they took the blame, and made sincere apologies.

It's no surprise there was an uprising of cancel culture initially because that kind of shit went on for too long and the victims never got any justice so you were seeing persecution of people who were probably more in a grey area because everyone was looking at it as black or white.
i disagree. the girl could've left at any time. she turned down his advances but he kept trying. is it admirable? no. is it sexual assault? no.
he ended up w/ blueballs and she decided to exploit his fame for her blog the next day.
or who was it, lena dunham saying she was raped by a republican? 'oh, it wasn't nonconsensual but if i'd known he was that. ew'.
there's a lot of real ones but a good amount of fake ones too.

All I'll say is I think you're underestimating the power dynamic because yes in theory anyone could leave at any time in most sexual mishaps whether they're assault or not but it's not as easy as you're making it out to be.
he wasn't her boss, he didn't have any power at all. if he did, she wouldn't have ran and blogged about it the next day. also, nothing happened. he shot his shot, she blocked it. a little while later, he shot another shot and she blocked that. he didn't force her. he just wanted an orgasm and she wanted a rich, celebrity friend.

OK.
tysm

carlomarxxx

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 62
  • Rep: -23
Re: Stevie Williams beefing with Weck
« Reply #695 on: December 18, 2019, 01:09:33 PM »
think it was false allegations, maybe?
that me too shit, the first few we all had our pitchforks out but after weinstein, woody allen and billy cosby, it started being innocent people like aziz ansari and others, i keep my judgement to a minimum.

Aziz was not innocent, and used his status to force himself upon women despite being told no.

There is a difference between Aziz (and that guy from rick and morty) where A. their offences were not as brutal and B. they took the blame, and made sincere apologies.

It's no surprise there was an uprising of cancel culture initially because that kind of shit went on for too long and the victims never got any justice so you were seeing persecution of people who were probably more in a grey area because everyone was looking at it as black or white.
i disagree. the girl could've left at any time. she turned down his advances but he kept trying. is it admirable? no. is it sexual assault? no.
he ended up w/ blueballs and she decided to exploit his fame for her blog the next day.
or who was it, lena dunham saying she was raped by a republican? 'oh, it wasn't nonconsensual but if i'd known he was that. ew'.
there's a lot of real ones but a good amount of fake ones too.

All I'll say is I think you're underestimating the power dynamic because yes in theory anyone could leave at any time in most sexual mishaps whether they're assault or not but it's not as easy as you're making it out to be.
he wasn't her boss, he didn't have any power at all. if he did, she wouldn't have ran and blogged about it the next day. also, nothing happened. he shot his shot, she blocked it. a little while later, he shot another shot and she blocked that. he didn't force her. he just wanted an orgasm and she wanted a rich, celebrity friend.

Aziz Ansari's story should not have made it to the press. In comparison to sexual assault it's like a person who broke their arm once saying to someone in a wheelchair "Hey, I'm disabled too."

Style Police

  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 1506
  • Rep: 206
Re: Stevie Williams beefing with Weck
« Reply #696 on: December 18, 2019, 01:22:09 PM »
Back on subject.


Meekin

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 186
  • Rep: -2
Re: Stevie Williams beefing with Weck
« Reply #697 on: December 18, 2019, 01:27:43 PM »
fuck no jumper
There was an interview with TK, when he was a plumber. He got asked if he gets recognized on the job and his response was "No. Plumbin in disguise." Everyone on SLAP thought he said "put him in the sky"

ihatejulio

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 514
  • Rep: 81
Re: Stevie Williams beefing with Weck
« Reply #698 on: December 18, 2019, 01:38:36 PM »
No Jumper is for guys who think Joe Rogan's podcast is too intellectual.

graypubes

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 570
  • Rep: -19
Re: Stevie Williams beefing with Weck
« Reply #699 on: December 18, 2019, 02:25:57 PM »
He has a face tat of Lisa Simpson. Case closed.

Tuff Lover

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 334
  • Rep: 8
Re: Stevie Williams beefing with Weck
« Reply #700 on: December 18, 2019, 02:26:26 PM »
Aziz Ansari's story should not have made it to the press. In comparison to sexual assault it's like a person who broke their arm once saying to someone in a wheelchair "Hey, I'm disabled too."

Or

Tuff Lover

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 334
  • Rep: 8
Re: Stevie Williams beefing with Weck
« Reply #701 on: December 18, 2019, 02:55:29 PM »

VHS ERA

  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 2713
  • Rep: 136
Re: Stevie Williams beefing with Weck
« Reply #702 on: December 18, 2019, 03:17:40 PM »
Interview was good on Stevies side. Never watched any No Jumper but yea the host is kinda wack.

This is the article they reference about Weck not making it lol
https://www.pressofatlanticcity.com/sports/skateboarding-is-their-life-two-area-men-pursue-pro-careers/article_fedcd347-78e1-5639-96da-212ac55ab492.html

also Id like to go on record predicting that Stevies CBD will be called CBDGK

BacksideWallride

  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 1161
  • Rep: -34
Re: Stevie Williams beefing with Weck
« Reply #703 on: December 18, 2019, 03:19:36 PM »
think it was false allegations, maybe?
that me too shit, the first few we all had our pitchforks out but after weinstein, woody allen and billy cosby, it started being innocent people like aziz ansari and others, i keep my judgement to a minimum.

Nope. "Adam22" wrote braggingly about fucking minors. Fuck that dude and goddammit my man Stevie sitting next to that fuck. Cliff notes please, I'm not giving that dude any clicks or hits

sharkin

  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 1850
  • Rep: 166
Re: Stevie Williams beefing with Weck
« Reply #704 on: December 18, 2019, 03:25:14 PM »
Someone should reach out to the guy who wrote that article to do a follow up article on Merlino and Morgenweck.

no habla mango

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 322
  • Rep: -59
Re: Stevie Williams beefing with Weck
« Reply #705 on: December 18, 2019, 03:51:10 PM »
think it was false allegations, maybe?
that me too shit, the first few we all had our pitchforks out but after weinstein, woody allen and billy cosby, it started being innocent people like aziz ansari and others, i keep my judgement to a minimum.

Nope. "Adam22" wrote braggingly about fucking minors. Fuck that dude and goddammit my man Stevie sitting next to that fuck. Cliff notes please, I'm not giving that dude any clicks or hits
idk enough to prove you wrong but 'he did it and i'm not giving him any clicks to prove it' isn't a strong argument. he's not going to get rich or rape minors over again if you provide a little of what real detectives call e-vih-dawnce.

jakeumms

  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 2625
  • Rep: 353
  • A mountain climber who plays an electric guitar
Re: Stevie Williams beefing with Weck
« Reply #706 on: December 18, 2019, 04:17:18 PM »
think it was false allegations, maybe?
that me too shit, the first few we all had our pitchforks out but after weinstein, woody allen and billy cosby, it started being innocent people like aziz ansari and others, i keep my judgement to a minimum.

Nope. "Adam22" wrote braggingly about fucking minors. Fuck that dude and goddammit my man Stevie sitting next to that fuck. Cliff notes please, I'm not giving that dude any clicks or hits
Stevie was a g and played it off like it didn't really bother him and said that he just got more followers from the whole thing. Threw a little shade at Weck by giving some backhanded compliments and talked about how Weck ultimately didn't get put on even though he's clearly a talented skater. That's how the article VHSERA posted got brought up. Stevie also has a CBD product coming but didn't wanna give away too much since it's not out yet.
Sad Boy Winter is around the corner and I should get to work on a new playlist

paraquat

  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 4143
  • Rep: 180
Re: Stevie Williams beefing with Weck
« Reply #707 on: December 18, 2019, 04:26:34 PM »
So DGKALIS owns the trademark for “Weckingball” 3.5 D chess.

Gary Ate My Peanuts

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 626
  • Rep: -63
Re: Stevie Williams beefing with Weck
« Reply #708 on: December 18, 2019, 04:54:58 PM »
So DGKALIS owns the trademark for “Weckingball” 3.5 D chess.

What a fucking move.
tysm

Style Police

  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 1506
  • Rep: 206
Re: Stevie Williams beefing with Weck
« Reply #709 on: December 18, 2019, 04:59:16 PM »
So DGKALIS owns the trademark for “Weckingball” 3.5 D chess.

Haha Khakis coming out of left field.




« Last Edit: December 18, 2019, 05:05:48 PM by Style Police »

h00man

  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 2929
  • Rep: 34
Re: Stevie Williams beefing with Weck
« Reply #710 on: December 18, 2019, 05:05:52 PM »
Joel Morgenweck and Merlino were best friends?!

EDIT: The amount of shit these kids talking on Kalis is disgusting. Fucking zoomers
« Last Edit: December 18, 2019, 05:10:39 PM by h00man »

 I meet up with her and I'm like wtf and she's got a baby stroller with her pushing it and she's pretty fat now


Schneaumunn

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 132
  • Rep: 12
  • it ain’t easy being green ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Re: Stevie Williams beefing with Weck
« Reply #711 on: December 18, 2019, 05:12:58 PM »
(╯ಠ_ಠ)╯︵ ┻━┻

GAY

  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 13750
  • Rep: 1869
  • Those that SLAP, can't.
Re: Stevie Williams beefing with Weck
« Reply #712 on: December 18, 2019, 05:13:13 PM »
HAHAHA Weck is such a mark.

Craig Lutzka

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 656
  • Rep: 94
Re: Stevie Williams beefing with Weck
« Reply #713 on: December 18, 2019, 05:14:25 PM »
As much as we don’t need another weck thread, I feel like Khakis deserves it for this power move.

Craig Lutzka

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 656
  • Rep: 94
Re: Stevie Williams beefing with Weck
« Reply #714 on: December 18, 2019, 05:15:46 PM »
Weck has never even had me like whoa

VHS ERA

  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 2713
  • Rep: 136
Re: Stevie Williams beefing with Weck
« Reply #715 on: December 18, 2019, 05:16:51 PM »
Yo I hope that Kalis shit is real that’s hilarious. wackingball fans are mad at Kalis in the comments.
« Last Edit: December 18, 2019, 05:27:52 PM by VHS ERA »

chipped tail

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 865
  • Rep: -34
Re: Stevie Williams beefing with Weck
« Reply #716 on: December 18, 2019, 05:31:08 PM »
As much as we don’t need another weck thread, I feel like Khakis deserves it for this power move.
Agreed this needs its own thread. lots of slappers might think the stevie beefing weck thread has run its course and miss out on the fun. tight seeing weck get bummed, cant wait 'til he goes live.

georgethecat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 872
  • Rep: 200
Re: Stevie Williams beefing with Weck
« Reply #717 on: December 18, 2019, 05:59:44 PM »
Boy howdy, this is so much more hilarious than anything Weck has ever said or done.

givecigstosurfgroms

  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 6125
  • Rep: -701
Re: Stevie Williams beefing with Weck
« Reply #718 on: December 18, 2019, 06:10:55 PM »
think it was false allegations, maybe?
that me too shit, the first few we all had our pitchforks out but after weinstein, woody allen and billy cosby, it started being innocent people like aziz ansari and others, i keep my judgement to a minimum.

Aziz was not innocent, and used his status to force himself upon women despite being told no.

There is a difference between Aziz (and that guy from rick and morty) where A. their offences were not as brutal and B. they took the blame, and made sincere apologies.

It's no surprise there was an uprising of cancel culture initially because that kind of shit went on for too long and the victims never got any justice so you were seeing persecution of people who were probably more in a grey area because everyone was looking at it as black or white.
i disagree. the girl could've left at any time. she turned down his advances but he kept trying. is it admirable? no. is it sexual assault? no.
he ended up w/ blueballs and she decided to exploit his fame for her blog the next day.
or who was it, lena dunham saying she was raped by a republican? 'oh, it wasn't nonconsensual but if i'd known he was that. ew'.
there's a lot of real ones but a good amount of fake ones too.

All I'll say is I think you're underestimating the power dynamic because yes in theory anyone could leave at any time in most sexual mishaps whether they're assault or not but it's not as easy as you're making it out to be.
he wasn't her boss, he didn't have any power at all. if he did, she wouldn't have ran and blogged about it the next day. also, nothing happened. he shot his shot, she blocked it. a little while later, he shot another shot and she blocked that. he didn't force her. he just wanted an orgasm and she wanted a rich, celebrity friend.

Aziz Ansari's story should not have made it to the press. In comparison to sexual assault it's like a person who broke their arm once saying to someone in a wheelchair "Hey, I'm disabled too."
cigarette smoke naw thats not me.

cuckflip

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 235
  • Rep: -48
Re: Stevie Williams beefing with Weck
« Reply #719 on: December 18, 2019, 06:18:11 PM »
Boy howdy, this is so much more hilarious than anything Weck has ever said or done.
Is it?