Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Anyone know if the new Polar "92!" denim fits like their "90s" denim?
Expand Quote
Yo I can’t find any review or topic on the polar 92 fit.
They look slimmer and with more aggressive taper compared to the 93…?
yea i wanna hear thoughts on these, i'm a big 93 fan so i'm probably gonna order a pair and try them out.
From what I’ve heard the 92s are the same fit as the 93s but with a tapered leg instead of a straight leg
Heard the same. I saw a shop comparing them to the fit of vintage Silvertabs, which are usually baggy with a pretty decently tapered leg.
this sounds sick, wish there were more photos of them on someone and them being a little oversized and not fitting like this which i personally hate:
they look cool here though.
I would say the new 92's, by eye, look more like a vintage Levis 550 fit whereas the 93's are closer to how a Silvertab would fit (baggier with much less taper). Looking at 93's online compared to how they actually fit differs from pair to pair. I just got the Washed Black 93s and they feel much baggier and more roomy than expected, but in a good way. 30/32 with just enough extra room in the waist to wear them how I like with a belt.
nice first post!
got the 92s today and they do fit a lot like 550s.
i got 32 waist, 30 length and sag them a lot, short king season baby.
Those look sick. Trendwatch 2022 is relaxed taper fit with converse one stars. Thats my prediction anyways. Making me want to cop a pair of these asap.
Didn’t even know the 92's were a new fit by polar. I just wanted some semi baggy light jeans and I like a narrow foot opening, so these were perfect!
I went with the same size waist I got in pretty much all my pants (Dickies, Carhartt) and they fit the way I like it. Actually went a size shorter than usual though, these are gonna be the first pair of pants I’m not cuffing in a very long time, so that feels weird, but I’m very happy overall.