I think this issue points to a larger issue of getting a skatepark built these days: To get a park built, you need to have something to show for it. In other words, if you are spending millions of taxpayer funds, elected officials (and those who pitched the idea) need something impressive to be photographed with during the ribbon cutting and for the general public to drive by. If you show up with two long ledges, a one foot high manny box, a jersey barrier, and the rest flatground, representatives of the general and park community will get knocked for wasting town/city funds because "there's nothing there". Can't instagram that.Couple this with the need for cities/towns to take everyone's (including non-skaters) comments into account because it's "their money", it becomes a convoluted mess. (There's also a conversation to be had about, IMO, these parks catering to the older individuals who know how local governments work versus kids who use the park the most but that's for another time.)
Don't get me wrong. I'm all for listening to the population on these things. However, there should be some priority voices and it should be the population that will utilize the resource the most. Either that, or just focus on one thing and stick with that.