Author Topic: Cult of the Huffer  (Read 95221 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

SupremePizza

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 396
  • Rep: 131
Re: Cult of the Huffer
« Reply #720 on: August 21, 2024, 02:05:43 PM »
I'm new to the Huffer and put 5.8s on there since I plan on replacing my 5.6s once they're done. They seem to work fine with 58mm conical fulls but I haven't tried anything else on it

Creachteach

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 369
  • Rep: 186
  • Pretty standard slap-head
Re: Cult of the Huffer
« Reply #721 on: August 22, 2024, 02:22:19 PM »
Expand Quote
I’m still omw to my first huffer. I’m having doubts about the setup I should be running on it. Does it want tiny wheels?
Should I get Aces for it? 60 or 66?

I have 159s and 169 on hand and I can go either forged or cast on both, and I have 1/8 risers.
I was planning on cast hollow 159 - and for a do it all setup. With 56mm wheels. 6’ bowls/4’ -5’ mini ramps and no complies on flat, boneless on banks. Old man stuff.

Can you guys point me in direction of some good huffer footy? What did the lord himself set it up with?

Sorry for 1000 questions.
[close]

8.75” trucks are the most preferred truck here, so Indy 159 or Ace 60 would work. I’d go for the Aces since the deck has a 14.75” wheelbase.

9” trucks will still work fine, they just hotrod a tiny bit

Wheels are a matter of personal preference

I’m still ACe curious, so I might give them a swing soon, even though I still have lot of life left in my current sets of hangers. I don’t mind the longer wheelbase, as I can’t stop bowl skating.
I’ve been skating a Madness Sam Beckett 8.75” shaped Pro model because I got it dirt cheap from a pal, and it goes really nice with my 169s. Can maybe see a sliver of the axle nuts from above, and the wheels hit the wells better.

I'm new to the Huffer and put 5.8s on there since I plan on replacing my 5.6s once they're done. They seem to work fine with 58mm conical fulls but I haven't tried anything else on it
I actually have brand new 5.8 Highs in my parts stash. Barely ridden. I didn’t really gel with them.
I might try and strap them on just for testing purposes.

I've used 8.5" to 9" axles. All can work. Depending what you want to do. With the wheel wells I plan to use Ace Classic 55s as a 9" axle lines the wheels up better with the wells. I personally prefer Ace due to the relatively long wheelbase.

Indy stage 4s can feel really nice on it also. 151s.
I’ll take your word as law in this matter.
Been following this thread for about two years almost. But due to some bad/good luck I haven’t gotten on the huffer yet.
Would an 1/8” riser fuck with the magical proportions? Will it be needed for 56mm on af1s?
Do you happenstance to know what kind of truck/wheel combo Cardiel used/uses on these?

The aces shortening the wb compared to an Indy was hardly an 1/8”, right?

149s on the Huffer feel great too. I put them on because I didn't have any 159s a while back and was pleasantly surprised.
I could imagine the front not being too bad, but how about that magic carpet in the back?

Agree with above, also consider thunder 151s  - great combo on the huff if you don’t mind a longer wheelbase. Still nimble. With 56mm classics it’s classy.
I think Thunders look sexy af. 151 and 161, but I’m not sure they’re for me though. The set I borrowed from a pal, was all twitch and no turn.
If anyone had made a 4-5 mm riser, I could maybe have made them work with some getting used to them.


WelcomeToHell

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 529
  • Rep: 410
Re: Cult of the Huffer
« Reply #722 on: August 22, 2024, 02:54:12 PM »
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
I’m still omw to my first huffer. I’m having doubts about the setup I should be running on it. Does it want tiny wheels?
Should I get Aces for it? 60 or 66?

I have 159s and 169 on hand and I can go either forged or cast on both, and I have 1/8 risers.
I was planning on cast hollow 159 - and for a do it all setup. With 56mm wheels. 6’ bowls/4’ -5’ mini ramps and no complies on flat, boneless on banks. Old man stuff.

Can you guys point me in direction of some good huffer footy? What did the lord himself set it up with?

Sorry for 1000 questions.
[close]

8.75” trucks are the most preferred truck here, so Indy 159 or Ace 60 would work. I’d go for the Aces since the deck has a 14.75” wheelbase.

9” trucks will still work fine, they just hotrod a tiny bit

Wheels are a matter of personal preference
[close]

I’m still ACe curious, so I might give them a swing soon, even though I still have lot of life left in my current sets of hangers. I don’t mind the longer wheelbase, as I can’t stop bowl skating.
I’ve been skating a Madness Sam Beckett 8.75” shaped Pro model because I got it dirt cheap from a pal, and it goes really nice with my 169s. Can maybe see a sliver of the axle nuts from above, and the wheels hit the wells better.

Expand Quote
I'm new to the Huffer and put 5.8s on there since I plan on replacing my 5.6s once they're done. They seem to work fine with 58mm conical fulls but I haven't tried anything else on it
[close]
I actually have brand new 5.8 Highs in my parts stash. Barely ridden. I didn’t really gel with them.
I might try and strap them on just for testing purposes.

Expand Quote
I've used 8.5" to 9" axles. All can work. Depending what you want to do. With the wheel wells I plan to use Ace Classic 55s as a 9" axle lines the wheels up better with the wells. I personally prefer Ace due to the relatively long wheelbase.

Indy stage 4s can feel really nice on it also. 151s.
[close]
I’ll take your word as law in this matter.
Been following this thread for about two years almost. But due to some bad/good luck I haven’t gotten on the huffer yet.
Would an 1/8” riser fuck with the magical proportions? Will it be needed for 56mm on af1s?
Do you happenstance to know what kind of truck/wheel combo Cardiel used/uses on these?

The aces shortening the wb compared to an Indy was hardly an 1/8”, right?

Expand Quote
149s on the Huffer feel great too. I put them on because I didn't have any 159s a while back and was pleasantly surprised.
[close]
I could imagine the front not being too bad, but how about that magic carpet in the back?

Expand Quote
Agree with above, also consider thunder 151s  - great combo on the huff if you don’t mind a longer wheelbase. Still nimble. With 56mm classics it’s classy.
[close]
I think Thunders look sexy af. 151 and 161, but I’m not sure they’re for me though. The set I borrowed from a pal, was all twitch and no turn.
If anyone had made a 4-5 mm riser, I could maybe have made them work with some getting used to them.

The 149s made it feel very surfy and the back could get a little twitchy. Not your standard Huffer setup but it was fun.

Too Frank To Fred

  • Guest
Re: Cult of the Huffer
« Reply #723 on: August 22, 2024, 06:18:38 PM »

Expand Quote
I've used 8.5" to 9" axles. All can work. Depending what you want to do. With the wheel wells I plan to use Ace Classic 55s as a 9" axle lines the wheels up better with the wells. I personally prefer Ace due to the relatively long wheelbase.

Indy stage 4s can feel really nice on it also. 151s.
[close]
I’ll take your word as law in this matter.
Been following this thread for about two years almost. But due to some bad/good luck I haven’t gotten on the huffer yet.
Would an 1/8” riser fuck with the magical proportions? Will it be needed for 56mm on af1s?
Do you happenstance to know what kind of truck/wheel combo Cardiel used/uses on these?

The aces shortening the wb compared to an Indy was hardly an 1/8”, right?



No idea what Cardiei used/ uses on his, unfortunately. I think CK one used Thunder 151s or even 149s. But he seems to be back on popsicles now.

I'd say you might get away with no risers on 56mm and AF1s. Might also depend on the wheel width/ shape and also what size trucks. I peronallywouldn't as I'm 200lbs, skate sloppy and like pretty loose trucks (even though I use Ace hard bushings). I need to go down to 54s to take off the risers.

As for your last question, it depends on stage 11s or 4s. I think I measured the stage 4s as having an even shorter effective wheelbase than Ace. Stage 4s will also give you a height that might not require risers... heavy trucks though...

perhaps the mysto rumored new geo Thunders will be the Huffer Goldilocks trucks.... ?

Esmith5488

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 2478
  • Rep: 514
Re: Cult of the Huffer
« Reply #724 on: August 22, 2024, 06:40:12 PM »
FWIW I used 56mm classics on a 60 af1 and didn’t have issues but I’m on the hard bushings

Mbrimson88

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 7602
  • Rep: 1553
  • Just another skate shop guy
  • Bronze Topic Start Bronze Topic Start : Start a topic with over 1,000 replies.
Re: Cult of the Huffer
« Reply #725 on: August 22, 2024, 11:45:07 PM »
Expand Quote

Expand Quote
I've used 8.5" to 9" axles. All can work. Depending what you want to do. With the wheel wells I plan to use Ace Classic 55s as a 9" axle lines the wheels up better with the wells. I personally prefer Ace due to the relatively long wheelbase.

Indy stage 4s can feel really nice on it also. 151s.
[close]
I’ll take your word as law in this matter.
Been following this thread for about two years almost. But due to some bad/good luck I haven’t gotten on the huffer yet.
Would an 1/8” riser fuck with the magical proportions? Will it be needed for 56mm on af1s?
Do you happenstance to know what kind of truck/wheel combo Cardiel used/uses on these?

The aces shortening the wb compared to an Indy was hardly an 1/8”, right?


[close]

No idea what Cardiei used/ uses on his, unfortunately. I think CK one used Thunder 151s or even 149s. But he seems to be back on popsicles now.

I'd say you might get away with no risers on 56mm and AF1s. Might also depend on the wheel width/ shape and also what size trucks. I peronallywouldn't as I'm 200lbs, skate sloppy and like pretty loose trucks (even though I use Ace hard bushings). I need to go down to 54s to take off the risers.

As for your last question, it depends on stage 11s or 4s. I think I measured the stage 4s as having an even shorter effective wheelbase than Ace. Stage 4s will also give you a height that might not require risers... heavy trucks though...

perhaps the mysto rumored new geo Thunders will be the Huffer Goldilocks trucks.... ?



Re Cardiel riding it, I don't recall any current era setups of his (that is anything past the mid 90s which tended to be under 8" popsicles for the most part / for any product info or seeing him in person when he was out here on tour before his accident) but the 1992-3 or so setup with him riding it was maybe about 166 Indy and micro wheels, which was common for the time.

I tried this setup on one Huffer and although it was fun, I ended up putting 60 mm cruiser type wheels on it, 1/8" risers and also ended up cutting wheel wells into it, just to allow for maximum turn on fairly loose trucks (soft bushings) but that doesn't really count as a regular rider.  I have older 166s on it too, more so just because I had a lot of old trucks and they work well on cruisers for me.

Others I know have definitely used 56 and 58 mm normal wheels, a variety of trucks including Ace Af1 60s, Indy in various stages and widths, almost anything really, some with risers, some with wheel wells, most without either.

I think the main thing I would do is set one up with parts you have and check it / go from there.  You can always cut wheel wells in or add risers later if you really need them, but I wouldn't usually start with them on there for normal wheels and normal trucks, unless that is how you ride all the time anyway.


Overall riding a Huffer is not a huge difference to riding an 8.75 to 9 or so wide popsicle, unless you are very specific with certain shapes, kicks or the like and I could do pretty much everything on it that I would usually do well enough - way better or easier than some of the other egg or similar shaped boards that I find the kicks, especially the tail way too short and pointy, so in that regard, the Huffer with the longish and nicely rounded tail is so good for me.

It is a big but fun board to have as an option, no matter what other size or shape boards you usually ride.



Gone since 1988.  I talk too much about skateboards.  Sorry.

BartHarleyJarvis

  • Trade Count: (+21)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 2613
  • Rep: 2000
  • What, me worry?
  • Bronze Topic Start Bronze Topic Start : Start a topic with over 1,000 replies.
Re: Cult of the Huffer
« Reply #726 on: August 23, 2024, 08:00:31 AM »
For me, huffer really comes alive when you don’t overbuild it. It’s obviously fun with big trucks and big wheels, but running 8.5-8.75 trucks and 53-55mm wheels is the perfect do it all set up. Perfect for parks or slappy sessions, but still versatile enough for street.
If you see offensive comments, just let it go into one eye and let it out of the other eye, no tears and not sadness or anger.


Creachteach

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 369
  • Rep: 186
  • Pretty standard slap-head
Re: Cult of the Huffer
« Reply #727 on: August 25, 2024, 12:40:35 PM »
I super appreciate you guys, taking the time to talk about skateboards with me.

Expand Quote

Expand Quote
I've used 8.5" to 9" axles. All can work. Depending what you want to do. With the wheel wells I plan to use Ace Classic 55s as a 9" axle lines the wheels up better with the wells. I personally prefer Ace due to the relatively long wheelbase.

Indy stage 4s can feel really nice on it also. 151s.
[close]
I’ll take your word as law in this matter.
Been following this thread for about two years almost. But due to some bad/good luck I haven’t gotten on the huffer yet.
Would an 1/8” riser fuck with the magical proportions? Will it be needed for 56mm on af1s?
Do you happenstance to know what kind of truck/wheel combo Cardiel used/uses on these?

The aces shortening the wb compared to an Indy was hardly an 1/8”, right?


[close]

No idea what Cardiei used/ uses on his, unfortunately. I think CK one used Thunder 151s or even 149s. But he seems to be back on popsicles now.

I'd say you might get away with no risers on 56mm and AF1s. Might also depend on the wheel width/ shape and also what size trucks. I peronallywouldn't as I'm 200lbs, skate sloppy and like pretty loose trucks (even though I use Ace hard bushings). I need to go down to 54s to take off the risers.

As for your last question, it depends on stage 11s or 4s. I think I measured the stage 4s as having an even shorter effective wheelbase than Ace. Stage 4s will also give you a height that might not require risers... heavy trucks though...

perhaps the mysto rumored new geo Thunders will be the Huffer Goldilocks trucks.... ?

I won’t hold my breath for new thunders, as they’ve been teasing them for quite some time.
Like Powell, has been teasing new trucks and board shapes. All their testing and prototyping.

I’m sloppy and uncoordinated, even though I’m now 187 lbs. Was 292 when I started skating at 34. My ankles are still shit/weak, so I’m still going to be rocking harder duro bushings, with kooky combos and weird washers.

I’ll give you guys the low down when it’s there. It’s probably going to be stage 11 cast hollow 159 with 56mm, and then I’ll slap the 169s back on the ol’ orange eagle with some big ass wheels.

For me, huffer really comes alive when you don’t overbuild it. It’s obviously fun with big trucks and big wheels, but running 8.5-8.75 trucks and 53-55mm wheels is the perfect do it all set up. Perfect for parks or slappy sessions, but still versatile enough for street.
I’ll definitely keep that in mind, as that’s what I’m kind of going for.

Expand Quote
Expand Quote

Expand Quote
I've used 8.5" to 9" axles. All can work. Depending what you want to do. With the wheel wells I plan to use Ace Classic 55s as a 9" axle lines the wheels up better with the wells. I personally prefer Ace due to the relatively long wheelbase.

Indy stage 4s can feel really nice on it also. 151s.
[close]
I’ll take your word as law in this matter.
Been following this thread for about two years almost. But due to some bad/good luck I haven’t gotten on the huffer yet.
Would an 1/8” riser fuck with the magical proportions? Will it be needed for 56mm on af1s?
Do you happenstance to know what kind of truck/wheel combo Cardiel used/uses on these?

The aces shortening the wb compared to an Indy was hardly an 1/8”, right?


[close]

No idea what Cardiei used/ uses on his, unfortunately. I think CK one used Thunder 151s or even 149s. But he seems to be back on popsicles now.

I'd say you might get away with no risers on 56mm and AF1s. Might also depend on the wheel width/ shape and also what size trucks. I peronallywouldn't as I'm 200lbs, skate sloppy and like pretty loose trucks (even though I use Ace hard bushings). I need to go down to 54s to take off the risers.

As for your last question, it depends on stage 11s or 4s. I think I measured the stage 4s as having an even shorter effective wheelbase than Ace. Stage 4s will also give you a height that might not require risers... heavy trucks though...

perhaps the mysto rumored new geo Thunders will be the Huffer Goldilocks trucks.... ?
[close]



Re Cardiel riding it, I don't recall any current era setups of his (that is anything past the mid 90s which tended to be under 8" popsicles for the most part / for any product info or seeing him in person when he was out here on tour before his accident) but the 1992-3 or so setup with him riding it was maybe about 166 Indy and micro wheels, which was common for the time.

I tried this setup on one Huffer and although it was fun, I ended up putting 60 mm cruiser type wheels on it, 1/8" risers and also ended up cutting wheel wells into it, just to allow for maximum turn on fairly loose trucks (soft bushings) but that doesn't really count as a regular rider.  I have older 166s on it too, more so just because I had a lot of old trucks and they work well on cruisers for me.

Others I know have definitely used 56 and 58 mm normal wheels, a variety of trucks including Ace Af1 60s, Indy in various stages and widths, almost anything really, some with risers, some with wheel wells, most without either.

I think the main thing I would do is set one up with parts you have and check it / go from there.  You can always cut wheel wells in or add risers later if you really need them, but I wouldn't usually start with them on there for normal wheels and normal trucks, unless that is how you ride all the time anyway.


Overall riding a Huffer is not a huge difference to riding an 8.75 to 9 or so wide popsicle, unless you are very specific with certain shapes, kicks or the like and I could do pretty much everything on it that I would usually do well enough - way better or easier than some of the other egg or similar shaped boards that I find the kicks, especially the tail way too short and pointy, so in that regard, the Huffer with the longish and nicely rounded tail is so good for me.

It is a big but fun board to have as an option, no matter what other size or shape boards you usually ride.

As always, thank you Mbrimson88 🙏
I appreciate your insights on these matters, and you taking the time to type all that out for me.

The tail on the huffer looks exactly like the one off the Orange eagle 9”, and that’s a big plus in my book.
I’ve tried other boards since and I think I’ll be set really nice on that 14.75” wb, as it isn’t too longboardy, but not too short for bowl.

I’ll get one and set it up, with what I have and go from there.

Too Frank To Fred

  • Guest
Re: Cult of the Huffer
« Reply #728 on: August 25, 2024, 02:58:37 PM »
Huffer tail s pretty unique. I wouldn't compare it to the 9" Orange eagle.

Esmith5488

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 2478
  • Rep: 514
Re: Cult of the Huffer
« Reply #729 on: August 26, 2024, 04:26:39 AM »
How similar is the huffer to the recent label snuffer? It’s the same right? I was thinking about setting it up again but less as a big wheel board but with some 53 easy sliders and just having it as a second setup

Too Frank To Fred

  • Guest
Re: Cult of the Huffer
« Reply #730 on: August 26, 2024, 08:44:01 AM »
Very close. Details are posted earlier in this thread but the Snuff is slightly wider than the Huffer (about 1/8") and the nose length and overall length is slightly shorter on the Snuff also.

Esmith5488

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 2478
  • Rep: 514
Re: Cult of the Huffer
« Reply #731 on: August 26, 2024, 09:10:10 AM »
Very close. Details are posted earlier in this thread but the Snuff is slightly wider than the Huffer (about 1/8") and the nose length and overall length is slightly shorter on the Snuff also.
Thanks I wonder if I would like the huffer a little better. There’s been a few I’ve wanted to grab in the past.

Mbrimson88

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 7602
  • Rep: 1553
  • Just another skate shop guy
  • Bronze Topic Start Bronze Topic Start : Start a topic with over 1,000 replies.
Re: Cult of the Huffer
« Reply #732 on: August 26, 2024, 03:09:17 PM »
Expand Quote
Very close. Details are posted earlier in this thread but the Snuff is slightly wider than the Huffer (about 1/8") and the nose length and overall length is slightly shorter on the Snuff also.
[close]
Thanks I wonder if I would like the huffer a little better. There’s been a few I’ve wanted to grab in the past.


I kept looking at the Cardiel Snuff board, but couldn't justify it, seeing as I had a few HUffers still, but they mostly sold out pretty quickly from the good shops and were more expensive than most DLX boards too.

Width: 9.25"
Length: 32.5"
Wheelbase: 14.75"


Taken from one site listing. Was that right?

* I should have just checked back through this thread.



Gone since 1988.  I talk too much about skateboards.  Sorry.

Esmith5488

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 2478
  • Rep: 514
Re: Cult of the Huffer
« Reply #733 on: August 26, 2024, 04:12:19 PM »
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Very close. Details are posted earlier in this thread but the Snuff is slightly wider than the Huffer (about 1/8") and the nose length and overall length is slightly shorter on the Snuff also.
[close]
Thanks I wonder if I would like the huffer a little better. There’s been a few I’ve wanted to grab in the past.
[close]


I kept looking at the Cardiel Snuff board, but couldn't justify it, seeing as I had a few HUffers still, but they mostly sold out pretty quickly from the good shops and were more expensive than most DLX boards too.

Width: 9.25"
Length: 32.5"
Wheelbase: 14.75"


Taken from one site listing. Was that right?

* I should have just checked back through this thread.
Yup! Those are the dims. I’m actually going to set it back up tomorrow.

Creachteach

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 369
  • Rep: 186
  • Pretty standard slap-head
Re: Cult of the Huffer
« Reply #734 on: September 02, 2024, 11:12:57 AM »
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Expand Quote
Very close. Details are posted earlier in this thread but the Snuff is slightly wider than the Huffer (about 1/8") and the nose length and overall length is slightly shorter on the Snuff also.
[close]
Thanks I wonder if I would like the huffer a little better. There’s been a few I’ve wanted to grab in the past.
[close]


I kept looking at the Cardiel Snuff board, but couldn't justify it, seeing as I had a few HUffers still, but they mostly sold out pretty quickly from the good shops and were more expensive than most DLX boards too.

Width: 9.25"
Length: 32.5"
Wheelbase: 14.75"


Taken from one site listing. Was that right?

* I should have just checked back through this thread.
[close]
Yup! Those are the dims. I’m actually going to set it back up tomorrow.

Pictures, and like spill your guts on the setup!

HeavyAndExpensive

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 1167
  • Rep: 166
Re: Cult of the Huffer
« Reply #735 on: September 03, 2024, 08:34:20 AM »


Does anyone know if this is the Huffer™ shape? Or at least a very similar/attempt at a Huffer™ shape?

I know the Huffers™ are ~8.75 over the trucks

Dimensions
8.75 X 32.25, 14.25" Wheelbase
Era 8.75 Shape

Its called the "Era" shape, which could easily be referring to the early 90s era.

Edit: These are from Metal and are on sale for 50$ on their website if anyone is interested. Not sure if its just a sale or a Labor day sale. About to get 4 decks for 150$.
« Last Edit: September 03, 2024, 08:46:04 AM by HeavyAndExpensive »

BartHarleyJarvis

  • Trade Count: (+21)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 2613
  • Rep: 2000
  • What, me worry?
  • Bronze Topic Start Bronze Topic Start : Start a topic with over 1,000 replies.
Re: Cult of the Huffer
« Reply #736 on: September 03, 2024, 12:08:40 PM »


Does anyone know if this is the Huffer™ shape? Or at least a very similar/attempt at a Huffer™ shape?

I know the Huffers™ are ~8.75 over the trucks

Dimensions
8.75 X 32.25, 14.25" Wheelbase
Era 8.75 Shape

Its called the "Era" shape, which could easily be referring to the early 90s era.

Edit: These are from Metal and are on sale for 50$ on their website if anyone is interested. Not sure if its just a sale or a Labor day sale. About to get 4 decks for 150$.

Can’t say for sure but looks like it might be closer to the DLX Flyer 8.75” shape. Huffer is definitely wider and the kicks are less symmetrical
If you see offensive comments, just let it go into one eye and let it out of the other eye, no tears and not sadness or anger.


Freelancevagrant

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 2651
  • Rep: 1707
Re: Cult of the Huffer
« Reply #737 on: September 04, 2024, 09:04:33 PM »
My dear friends I have returned, and still preach the good word.



Anti Hero Huffer shape 9.18"×32.62" 14.81WB
Film Trucks 6.5 cut bushings, no washers
Spitefire formula 4 classic shape 56mm 99a
Spagear hardware 7/8" allen
Pepper Grip

**featuring my kitten, Darla**
Well I have like 9 Andy Anderson dated flight decks.

Freelancevagrant

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 2651
  • Rep: 1707
Re: Cult of the Huffer
« Reply #738 on: September 04, 2024, 09:15:25 PM »


Does anyone know if this is the Huffer™ shape? Or at least a very similar/attempt at a Huffer™ shape?

I know the Huffers™ are ~8.75 over the trucks

Dimensions
8.75 X 32.25, 14.25" Wheelbase
Era 8.75 Shape

Its called the "Era" shape, which could easily be referring to the early 90s era.

Edit: These are from Metal and are on sale for 50$ on their website if anyone is interested. Not sure if its just a sale or a Labor day sale. About to get 4 decks for 150$.

This is the exact same shape as the AWS/Habitat 8.75 egg.

@BartHarleyJarvis the flyer shape is 31.5”. It’s the standard DLX 8.75” egg shape that krooked and 18 run.
Well I have like 9 Andy Anderson dated flight decks.

Mbrimson88

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 7602
  • Rep: 1553
  • Just another skate shop guy
  • Bronze Topic Start Bronze Topic Start : Start a topic with over 1,000 replies.
Re: Cult of the Huffer
« Reply #739 on: September 05, 2024, 03:32:05 AM »
Expand Quote

Does anyone know if this is the Huffer™ shape? Or at least a very similar/attempt at a Huffer™ shape?

I know the Huffers™ are ~8.75 over the trucks

Dimensions
8.75 X 32.25, 14.25" Wheelbase
Era 8.75 Shape

Its called the "Era" shape, which could easily be referring to the early 90s era.

Edit: These are from Metal and are on sale for 50$ on their website if anyone is interested. Not sure if its just a sale or a Labor day sale. About to get 4 decks for 150$.
[close]

This is the exact same shape as the AWS/Habitat 8.75 egg.

@BartHarleyJarvis the flyer shape is 31.5”. It’s the standard DLX 8.75” egg shape that krooked and 18 run.


I think the only one still in current production that really comes close at all to a Huffer is the Phawt shape from Crail / Girl after Cory was riding a Huffer so they made one too.

Some others were the same or very close, but most have a bit more in the nose and smaller tails like a lot of the Heroin eggs, but besides old stock, are there any others, like the Black Label Cardiel Snuff deck?


https://crailtap.com/collections/all/9-125?sort_by=title-ascending&filter.v.m.shapeguide.shapeguide=G041

G041:
9.125" x 32.625"
Wheelbase: 14.75"
Nose: 6.9375"
Tail: 6.7375"


Been talked about and shown back on page 4 of this thread too - thanks Frank:

https://www.slapmagazine.com/index.php?topic=121639.90

Gone since 1988.  I talk too much about skateboards.  Sorry.

Freelancevagrant

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 2651
  • Rep: 1707
Re: Cult of the Huffer
« Reply #740 on: September 05, 2024, 04:13:56 AM »
Yeah they made the phawt because ck was only skating the huffer. Or that’s at least what I read on here.

A perfectly scaled down huffer is the black label Reuter Egg.

9.0" x 32.2" 14.38" wheelbase


« Last Edit: September 05, 2024, 06:06:14 AM by Freelancevagrant »
Well I have like 9 Andy Anderson dated flight decks.

pops

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 1223
  • Rep: 362
    •  avatar image
  • SLAP OG SLAP OG : Been around since SLAP was a mag.
Re: Cult of the Huffer
« Reply #741 on: September 05, 2024, 10:59:17 AM »
Yeah they made the phawt because ck was only skating the huffer. Or that’s at least what I read on here.

A perfectly scaled down huffer is the black label Reuter Egg.

9.0" x 32.2" 14.38" wheelbase




That's perfect. I always found Huffer to be little too long to my tastes. 14.38-14.5. wheelbase feels on point.

JimmyFive

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 221
  • Rep: 124
Re: Cult of the Huffer
« Reply #742 on: September 06, 2024, 02:41:30 AM »
No I think the Huffer has scared dims IR.

Too Frank To Fred

  • Guest
Re: Cult of the Huffer
« Reply #743 on: September 06, 2024, 07:14:41 AM »
No I think the Huffer has scared dims IR.

100.

Painted Baby

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 5955
  • Rep: 1835
  • They're trying to build a prison
Re: Cult of the Huffer
« Reply #744 on: September 06, 2024, 05:59:44 PM »
This shape looks pretty huffer like with a short WB. Thinking about pulling one but its $100 and I dont need anymore decks rn.
https://wraybros.bigcartel.com/product/markovich-x-wray-collab-deck
I think that's our old buddy Dream Girl. You see it listed as 9, 9.125 and 9.25 but 9.38 is a new one. It looks about right from the top down though. Super great shape and kind of a perfect curb board if you want a smaller wheelbase.

JPKInJapan

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 8
  • Rep: 4
Re: Cult of the Huffer
« Reply #745 on: September 24, 2024, 04:49:11 AM »
Huffer tail s pretty unique. I wouldn't compare it to the 9" Orange eagle.

I have the orange eagle and like the tail but overall the board is sometimes a little too hefty (but still fun).  I also have a white eagle and like the tail on that too and overall a great board.  Can anybody say if the tail on the huffer is at least as spacious as the white eagle and in between the orange and white?  I have size 13 feet and like some surface area.  I like the measurements of the huffer but was curious about the tail. 

Too Frank To Fred

  • Guest
Re: Cult of the Huffer
« Reply #746 on: September 24, 2024, 08:03:06 AM »
I don't think you can compare the Huffer tail to a popsicle tail in terms of shape. It's a full shaped tail that tapers only a little a bit. Not like an egg, but not like a popsicle. Full of secret sauce that is conducive to both 360 flips AND tail blocks. Ponder that one....

Tail length is 6.75", same as the Orange Eagle.

BartHarleyJarvis

  • Trade Count: (+21)
  • SLAP Pal
  • ******
  • Posts: 2613
  • Rep: 2000
  • What, me worry?
  • Bronze Topic Start Bronze Topic Start : Start a topic with over 1,000 replies.
Re: Cult of the Huffer
« Reply #747 on: September 24, 2024, 08:26:50 AM »
The tail is good
If you see offensive comments, just let it go into one eye and let it out of the other eye, no tears and not sadness or anger.


bombsaway86

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 502
  • Rep: 238
Re: Cult of the Huffer
« Reply #748 on: September 24, 2024, 09:50:45 AM »
Expand Quote
Huffer tail s pretty unique. I wouldn't compare it to the 9" Orange eagle.
[close]

I have the orange eagle and like the tail but overall the board is sometimes a little too hefty (but still fun).  I also have a white eagle and like the tail on that too and overall a great board.  Can anybody say if the tail on the huffer is at least as spacious as the white eagle and in between the orange and white?  I have size 13 feet and like some surface area.  I like the measurements of the huffer but was curious about the tail.

I’m riding a white eagle now and have a huffer deck in the stash. The tails are almost identical, the huffer just gets slightly wider near the back truck. Huffer is narrower at the front truck which makes it feel smaller than the white eagle for me. I’m a size 12, so I feel you on needing some surface area.

Huffer on top of white eagle
Lined up at the back pocket, tails line up perfectly



Huffer on top of orange eagle

Rock over London, rock on Chicago

bombsaway86

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 502
  • Rep: 238
Re: Cult of the Huffer
« Reply #749 on: September 24, 2024, 09:57:04 AM »
It’s crazy looking at the pictures comparing the huffer to the orange and white eagles. They’re all fairly close in dimensions but skate so differently. Orange eagle feels really big and heavy. Huffer feels smaller than the white eagle to me even though it’s longer and wider in the middle. The tapered nose really cuts a lot of weight
Rock over London, rock on Chicago